Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Ridicilous trolling or real?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    288

    Talking Ridicilous trolling or real?

    Spotted this on the news thread and it makes me think someone missed their april fools deadline by 6 weeks


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,271
    The thought did cross my mind but there is also a circumstance why it might be for real.

    When aerospace companies recruit new graduate engineers one thing they often do to get them used to company processes and design projects is to give them a 'Blue sky thinking' project. So in this case take the B-1B and put together a concept for mounting a gun system onto it, that way the new engineers can go through the process of a design project within the company organisation. There is a secondary benefit that on occasion that the concepts developed could have secondary applications that could be applied to other projects that could come along. For example lets say the USAF comes to Boeing and asks them to mount some special recognisance antenna system that is shock resistant and deployable out of the B-1B bomb bay, the work done on this gun system mount could be adaptable to that requirement. To that end it makes sense for the company to Patent any ideas that their engineers come up with even if it is a paper exercise.
    Because sometimes in life we need a bit of fun

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXNAp3mKepc

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    .de
    Posts
    2,722
    Spotted this on the news thread and it makes me think someone missed their april fools deadline by 6 weeks
    When I first saw your post the first thing to flash in my mind was the Tupolev Tu-2Sh - 88 PPSh-41 submachine guns firing out of the bomb bay:

    Name:  mistragiraffe.jpg
Views: 894
Size:  130.0 KB

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    288
    @fedaykin, that makes sense really. Thanks for that

    @Levsha, how much fun would that be? It's like a meat grinder with wings on. Wonder why it didn't catch on ;-)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,980
    Man hours even in Stalinist Soviet Union were not infinite. I cannot imagine the reload time. And think how vulnerable you'd be with trying to line up on targets.
    Go Huskers!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    288
    And think how vulnerable you'd be with trying to line up on targets.
    Yeah and at very low altitude too! I bet running in straight and level at 50m above the ground made the chance of catching that golden BB rather uncomfortably large!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    135
    Any that's the story behind why cluster bombs were invented.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    108
    And Vulcan cannon.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    5,270
    I vote troll.

    The B-36 had retractable gun turrets an it was a maintenance nightmare. And the B-36 was slow and didn't have the airflow and acoustics problems a fast jet has.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    594
    If it's genuine then I'd suggest it has more to do with the carriage, deployment and aiming systems than the weapon itself as it's drawn. As has ben suggested above it cold be for some form of retractable recon unit or thinking further ahead it could easily be a development "Turret"for an air-to-ground directed energy (laser) type weapon

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES