Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 94

Thread: Critique Of TIGHAR By Ex-member/Donor

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    138
    How far do you mean ?

    J Boyle: It depends in how far you mean by "that far". You are not defining what you mean. If you read the website you will see various possible ranges shown and with differing fuel loads that we know from records. There is also the guarantee from Lockheed in range and LR 487 to look at and there is also the ADEN-DAKAR FP of 4307 Statute Miles in 28 Hours 40 minutes "nil wind" made by Comdr C. Williams which is in the set of FP's he produced for Earhart. The generally accepted fuel load of 1100 USG cannot be counted on either as Mr. R. Iredale in LAE assured people he topped off the tanks before they left.

    In effect, I am not so concerned with the range due to what we do not know, ie: How far it got and where it ended up at the extreme point of distance from LAE. I only offer a 'Hypothesis'. For sure we know that they did not find Howland and again the HF S5 counted by TIGHAR and others as meaning they were on top of Howland does not count as Radio Gurus repeatedly say that S5 could be attained from hundreds of miles away, yet that "furphy" persists.

    What concerns me most is locating the wreck again and hopefully we can find the pile with LiDAR where bulldozer tracks indicate the movements.

    What I do think is that the speeds outbound that we can work with given the times and distances were very slow. The pointer there is that from the S.S. ONTARIO Position given from the ships log at 1030 GMT 2 July and after 1352 Sm on reaching the ship through the dog leg of CHOISEUL (according to me), the Average Groundspeed is only 127 Smph (111 Knots).

    Regards,

    RPM...
    www.earhartsearchpng.com
    Last edited by RPM, FF, TGT...; 30th January 2018 at 04:34.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Grantown on Spey
    Posts
    2,423
    makes me ponder the hazards of long distance flying over remote terrain and oceans ,so much is taken for granted these days, watching videos and eating meals at 30,000 feet then having a sleep....

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cambridge, Duxfordshire
    Posts
    3,454
    Just out of interest - I am sure you now have this information - but the FAA TCDS for the S3H1 does indeed show max take-off power as 600HP, as opposed to rated output of 550HP - http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgMakeModel.nsf/0/8690e2dd941de2e08525670d005f9cce/$FILE/E-143.pdf


    It would appear that this is quite likely a record of an engine found, but can anything possibly tie C/N 1055 to an aircraft?
    Last edited by Beermat; 30th January 2018 at 13:45.
    www.whirlwindfighterproject.org
    It's all good. Probably.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cambridge, Duxfordshire
    Posts
    3,454
    Being a bit slow there, sorry. The constructor's number for Erhardt's L10 was, of course, 1055. Sorry, I am new to this.
    www.whirlwindfighterproject.org
    It's all good. Probably.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    138
    For Beermat:

    Re: the T.O. power rating.... Yes, I dug a bit deeper after the visit to the P & W Office in 1997 and found the 600 H.P Rating and then it was confirmed again when I obtained a copy of Lockheed Report 487 which deals with the two Long Range version of the L10, C/N 1055 and it could be taken to deal with C/N 1065 also ("The Daily Express"). I knew the Construction Number (C/N) of Earhart's Electra from reading "The Sound of Wings" by Mary Lovell and when i received a faxed copy of the WWII map from Don Angwin in early 1994 I saw "C/N 1055" coming though out of the Fax machine and had a 'hair on the back if the neck' moment ! Altogether the cryptic "Ref: 600 H.P. S3H1 C/N1055" are of course all indicators for the missing Electra with the S3H1 designation being for "Civil" or "Commercial" engines and the "AN-1" designation being the "Military" code for the same 550 H.P. Wasp.... which is most probably why the USAAF said, "Not one of ours". Just to confuse everybody, the various arms if the U.S. Forces had their own designations for the 550 H.P. Wasp.... in the same vein as the various designations for the same aircraft in the USAAF, USN, USMC.....

    RPM...
    www.earhartsearchpng.com
    Last edited by RPM, FF, TGT...; 1st February 2018 at 14:41.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    Gillespie has a rather interesting approach for fundraising with regards to TIGHAR - if it doesn't have a big and immediate payoff, it seems he's not that interested.

    Case in point, the Amazon Smile program, where people who shop on Amazon can designate a charity to receive a small portion of their receipts. Obviously, the more people who shop on Amazon who select your charity, the more money the charity receives - but it is NEVER going to be a huge amount. Amazon does it strictly as a PR move, it seems to me. Gillespie got quite excited several years ago when a person on the TIGHAR forums suggested people start doing Amazon Smile for TIGHAR (this was before Gillespie implemented pay-to-post and banned all non-members from the forums).

    There the matter rested for awhile, until a member queried how things were going with Smile (Gillespie hadn't done anything to promote or encourage it, beyond the initial enthusiasm, if I recall correctly). Gillespie flatly dismissed it as a waste, as TIGHAR got a check for a few dollars, once in awhile.

    Which prompted me, at least, to switch my Smile charity to one that was at least publicly appreciative of ANY support it could get.
    Last edited by MFowler; 30th January 2018 at 15:14.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    cambridge uk
    Posts
    6,377
    Aircraft still go missing and even with all the technology available remain unfound --MH370 being one.It is frightening how we have become so reliant on technology .

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    Sabrejet said, "All shameful really - but is it within the law? I'm assuming that yes it is, since I imagine that these individuals haven't emptied the pot fully and so can claim that the charity is doing business."

    The answer is, It depends. The Internal Revenue Service says that non-profits cannot compensate executive officers "excessively," but then, typically, doesn't define what constitutes excessive. It does, however, lay out in great detail how executive compensation should be awarded. Basically:
    1. The board should arrange for an "independent body" (which means that the person receiving the compensation should not be part of the review process) to conduct a "comparability review." Many nonprofits task a "compensation committee," or use their executive committee, or another sub-group/task force of board members, for this purpose. TIGHAR can't use its executive committee because Gillespie and Thrasher ARE the executive committee, and have been since the group's inception.
    2. The independent body should take a look at "comparable" salary and benefits data, such as data available from salary and benefit surveys, to learn what nonprofit employers with similar missions, and of a similar budget size, that are located in the same, or a similar geographic region, pay their senior leaders.
    3. The board/independent body that is conducting the review should document who was involved, (and their "independence" i.e., that they do not receive compensation from the nonprofit) and the process used to conduct the review, as well as the disposition of the full board's decision to approve the executive director's compensation (minutes of a meeting are fine for this). The documentation should demonstrate that the board took the comparable data into consideration when it approved the compensation.


    TIGHAR doesn't appear to operate that way. Gillespie and Thrasher tell their board what to pay them; the board doesn't look at comparable salaries (that I am aware of; and there is no compensation committee per se. TIGHAR does keep board minutes (although it seldom posts more than snippets on its forum).

    I'm not sure that TIGHAR's board members fully realize that doing things this way leaves them, personally, potentially vulnerable to legal action if the IRS were to investigate and find the compensation amounts, award method or process improper in any way. As one expert on the topic put it, "if you have an employee whose compensation package exceeds $100,000, you better be prepared to defend it."
    Last edited by MFowler; 1st February 2018 at 01:59.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    138
    "Scenes we would like to see..."

    In the questionable matters arising in this thread, the talk of IRS Audits could be said to come under the heading of "Scenes we would like to see..." or could be depicted in the line of cartoons called "Insanity Streak..."

    RPM...
    www.earhartsearchpng.com
    Last edited by RPM, FF, TGT...; 1st February 2018 at 14:44.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    138
    Monty Fowler....

    Check PM's

    RPM...

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    138
    All very interesting...

    Well, after near 7050 views of this thread in nearly one whole month shows that there is still some interest "out there" regarding quite a few mystery incidents that happened many, many years ago which still interest many people around the world. I speak of the oldest mystery which involved "Un avion Francais"... the fabled White Bird which may have crossed the Atlantic before Lindbergh. I speak of another lost aircraft for which I also have spent time in searching over the past 23 years... The Electra. There are also many aircraft missing from WWII where many airmen were lost and remain lost seemingly, forever.

    Who will go looking ?

    TIGHAR set itself up as an organisation dedicated as an International body for recovering "Historic Aircraft"... Yet as we have read in a Critique by an ex-Member of TIGHAR it has not recovered one single solitary Historic Aircraft in its' existence over the last nearly 33 years and yet around a reported US$12 Million in total has been received and been distributed.... strangely enough, this TIGHAR Organisation is set up as a non-profit organisation but the critique says that there is no way to see where the money has been spent on various projects, as there should be, because of the way the record keeping is done and that records of actual spending on projects has not been made public.

    Accounts keeping seems to be blatantly ignored.

    TIGHAR has failed. It has failed its' members. It has failed in its' purpose and it now seems to be solely a money-grubbing organisation for the benefit of the Management Team as described in the critique.

    Nothing is going to happen to TIGHAR until it ceases to exist by consensus of the Members of TIGHAR themselves. If TIGHAR Members have any sense, they now all need to depart the organisation and have nothing more to do with it.

    I propose that this thread has run its' course and should be shut down.

    RPM...
    David Billings
    www.earhartsearchpng.com

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Where you wish you were.
    Posts
    9,243
    Well, you're free to ignore this thread.
    First you hijack the thread with discourses on your theory (which you're free to peruse on another thread)...then want to shut it down because you're tired of it?

    The fact remains the group is still out there and it's just a matter of time before their next headline grabbing pseudo-scientific "smoking gun" is offered to garner new members or donations.
    There are two sides to every story. The truth is usually somewhere between the two.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    138
    Thanks for the advice...

    Thanks for the advice J Boyle. Not my intention to hijack the thread J Boyle, it was my intention to show how TIGHAR will be extremely devious and muddy the waters for any other search entity as often as it can when it thinks any other search entity may take funding (ie: Money) away from it. TIGHAR disparages anybody that does not have the same view as itself. I didn't know any other way to explain what happened.

    Likewise, you didn't have to read and absorb what I wrote either. No offence intended. If you didn't read it, I'll bet a lot of people were actually interested in how devious he can be.

    I was not aware there was a thread which I could peruse about my theory. Any idea where it is ?

    I think Mr. Gillespie's headline grabbing days are about over, I'll be surprised if there is a Major headline grabbing scientific methodology murky blob idea emanating out of Oxford Pa. This thread alone has been bad enough publicity for Dear Leader.

    So what do you reckon his next trick will be then ? Any idea ? The Glenn Miller fundraiser seems to have gone into a Cul-de Sac. The point is, he has not recovered a single Historic Aircraft, he is not going to recover an Historic Aircraft and he never will recover an Historic Aircraft and until the members of that organisation pack up and leave he will continue in the same vein.

    RPM...
    Last edited by RPM, FF, TGT...; 2nd February 2018 at 15:07.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    Looking at executive compensation ...

    The IRS doesn't define "excessive" compensation, but it does give guidance on how to set it. Basically, an independent body should take a look at "comparable" salary and benefits data, such as data available from salary and benefit surveys, to learn what nonprofit employers with similar missions, and of a similar budget size, that are located in the same, or a similar geographic region, pay their senior leaders.

    Keep that in mind with regards to the following. In November 2015, Gillespie's pay came up for some pointed discussion on the TIGHAR forums, and it was also apparently raised at a board meeting, which prompted Gillespie to post a long explanation in the forums. His bottom line? "TIGHAR is getting a bargain."

    Who was he comparing TIGHAR to? The Experimental Aircraft Association, which I assume most of you here have heard of. But if you look at the numbers, it doesn't wash. It's like comparing apples to cucumbers.

    -- The EAA has more than 200,000 members. TIGHAR has 1,000-1,500. I'll be generous and give them 1,500. The EAA is more than 130 times larger.

    -- Both can make a legitimate claim to being global organizations, since they have members on numerous continents. That one's a draw.

    -- In his post, Gillespie listed the lengthy number of EAA vice presidents who do different things, and then said he and his wife, Pat Thrasher, do almost all of those for one price, his salary. Here's what the numbers say:
    • In the last three tax years, the EAA spent $37.34 million for all salaries, on expenses of $100.71 million. TIGHAR spent $639,658 for all salaries, on expenses of $1.51 million. TIGHAR's expenses aren't even 2 percent of EAAs.
    • Over the last three years, EAA's salaries totaled 37 percent of expenses. TIGHAR's salaries totaled 42 percent of expenses. TIGHAR's aggregate salary expenditures are 5 percent higher than EAA's, although the EAA is much, much larger and has multi-faceted interests, projects and programs (more complexity needs more managers).
    • For the 2015 tax year, the EAA's salary as a percentage of expenses remained at 37 percent. TIGHAR's increased to 60 percent.

    These numbers are from each groups publicly-available IRS 990 forms. I get them from Guidestar. Anyone who wants to can download the same forms I did and total these numbers up. If you find something different, by all means share.

    I think the bottom line is, the only way these two groups are "comparable" is that both have the word AIRCRAFT in their name. Which takes us back to the first paragraph of this post.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    RPM, FF, TGT said "Money sent but no Product -

    ... If I pay up front for something to be delivered to my doorstep there are laws which protect me from non-delivery and I will get my money back unless there is a case of abject bankruptcy, then I most probably will not. Surely there are laws in the United States that protect Customers in that way. I have read that some TIGHAR Members who paid into the second "Literary Guild" did ask for their money back when the book title changed to the Electra 10E and after a bit of time passed through negotiations, they succeeded.

    Monty: "The video has never happened. Other than saying in January 2016 it is "indefinitely delayed," Gillespie refuses to discuss it. It has now been, what, two-and-a-half years since Niku VIII? TIGHAR made a promise, hasn't kept it, has no schedule to keep it, and is keeping the money in the meantime."

    Individuals or a Class of individuals should then ask for their money back. If money went "in" and there is a record of same, going out, through a bank, it is accountable. As this sum is $49 and since it was asked for and received there will have been a large turnover of TIGHAR Members through the revolving door so my best guess there would be that ex-Members, "They who, verily, have seen the light", will just write off the $49 as a bad experience."


    As far as consumer protection in the US goes, it's pretty murky and you are largely on your own, unfortunately - unless the amount of money is SO huge, state or federal officials find it politically attractive to get involved.

    The Better Business Bureau, a quasi-government organization, only helps with customer complaints, not with getting your money back. You, as an individual, can file a claim against another person or entity in your Small Claims or Magistrate Court, but there are (sometimes steep) filing fees, and you have to get the court to agree to hear your case. A county prosecutor isn't even going to touch a $49 dispute. Ditto for any private attorney - the amount you lost might buy 15 minutes of his time to talk to you about the hopelessness of your case.

    So, in essence, a US non-profit is pretty much free to do whatever it wants with your money, regardless of it promised to do. Most non-profits, though, recognize that repeatedly breaking faith with its own members (i.e., screwing them out of money, among other things) can lead to some very negative consequences.

    Gillespie's refusal to discuss the fate of the Niku VIII video basically removes member's option to negotiate for their money back, unless they do so privately. There simply isn't enough money involved for an kind of class-action or even state law enforcement level action to attract the interest it needs to get started.

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    825
    hi,
    The feds could only get Big Al for tax evasion, although every man and his dog knew his money source, so would a phone tip off do the trick or has he been too clever for that?

  17. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    J Boyle said, "I have been told by someone more familiar with the group than myself, that according to tax records, the group has taken in about $11 million over the years. (If someone has better information, I'm willing to be corrected.)

    Aside from the pity that the group has never recovering a complete aircraft, or even project, let alone finding AE, think what aircraft that money could have saved. There are many groups that could have really put that kind of funding to use."


    A valid point, and it seems from looking at TIGHAR's finances over the years that salaries and operating costs are as much, if not more so, important than its stated mission.

    Consider that from 2001-2015, almost one out of every three dollars TIGHAR spent went directly into Ric Gillespie and Pat Thrasher's pockets - more than $2.4 million in salary to them, or the rent (occupancy costs) they charge TIGHAR to use part of their home as TIGHAR's office. The temporary help they sometimes hire is a minute fraction of that amount.

    Regarding jack windsor's question about a "phone tip off," well ... good luck with that. The IRS non-profit division is so understaffed, and so overwhelmed with new and existing non-profit applications, issues, etc., that no investigation is going to get started unless the issue is so huge and plain and obvious that the government CAN'T ignore it. I know because I dealt with them on and off in a previous life.

    Although we know of one formal written complaint against TIGHAR filed with the IRS, by former TIGHAR donor Tim Mellon, Gillespie has never said what, if anything, came of it. If there was any kind of enforcement action, even an advisory opinion or site visit, and he has said nothing, that, too, speaks volumes.
    Last edited by MFowler; 5th February 2018 at 23:09.

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    639
    Thanks for informing us about the dubious (and seemingly all unsuccessful efforts) of this organization.

  19. #79
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Black Six
    Posts
    20,350
    I propose that this thread has run its' course and should be shut down.

    RPM...
    David Billings
    Thank you for your proposal.

    It is not Forum policy ever to close threads where the discussion is interesting and legal. Often zombie threads arise from wherever zombie threads live and add useful information many years later.

    Moggy
    Moderator

  20. #80
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    The IRS allows non-profits to use a portion of a private dwelling as their "office," and to charge rent of fair market value against the prevailing rents in the area, square footage used, etc. There are some other requirements like having a separate entrance, regularly posted business hours, etc., that I won't go into here.

    TIGHAR appears to have consistently used that allowance, based on tax records over the last 15 years. Looking on either the occupancy cost or rent lines in the 990 tax forms, TIGHAR has been charged more than $232,000 by Gillespie and Thrasher to rent its various home offices, an average of $15,500 a year. You would expect the rental costs to be fairly steady from year-to-year, barring a major thing like a plumbing disaster or structurally-required remodeling. But, as with other TIGHAR expenses, that amount has fluctuated wildly, as the chart below shows, which compares occupancy costs as a percentage of total revenue for that year:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TIGHAR_occupancy.jpg 
Views:	267 
Size:	37.9 KB 
ID:	258781

    A few curious things ... from 2001-2005, the rent amount flip-flopped between $7,200 and $7,800 each year. The exact $500 difference from year-to-year is hard to explain, but it appears overall to be a modest and defensible number. There are several years where the amount charged to TIGHAR for rent doubles, or more, but the 990 forms give no specifics. Starting in 2013, however, the yearly occupancy amount regularly becomes five figures, totaling more than $110,000. Without speculating on the cause for that increase, and without knowing specifics of the newest TIGHAR office, it's public knowledge that Gillespie and Thrasher moved into their rural Pennsylvania 1860 farmhouse in December 2013.
    Last edited by MFowler; 7th February 2018 at 20:32.

  21. #81
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Where you wish you were.
    Posts
    9,243
    TIGHAR has released another study that claims the bones found on Gardner island (as it was known at the time) in 1940 belong to AE, dispute the original finding of a UK-trained doctor (who actually examined the bones).
    The bones were lost in the 40s after initial hands on examination determined they belonged to a European male.
    The study also provided measurements.
    Seemingly trying to fortify his theory that AE died on the island, RG disputes AE's height as given in official records including her pilots license.

    Instead, his researcher uses a software program based on photos to make AE fit the long lost bones. The software was developed by the same team that worked with the group a few years past trying to prove a metal patch found on the island came from AE's Lockheed (trying to match rivet lines from a grainy photo). I believe RG referred to that as a "smoking gun" of irrefutable proof, but l haven't heard much about for sometime.

    A couple of years ago, a UK/Austrailian team of anthropologists Cross and Wright looked at the original notes and agreed with the original 1940 determination that the bones were from a male. I give the TIGHAR full marks for adding that in their release.
    I might also no remind readers that, unlike the TIGHAR team, Cross and Wright have no financial stake in their findings.

    Also, I wonder if the new technical report was published in an accredited peer review journal?

    You can read TIGHAR'S press release here:
    https://tighar.org


    So we have dueling anthropologists... one side believes the original notes, the other relies on software to come up with a TIGHAR-friendly conclusion.
    A comment on the Aviation Mystery forum said RG admits to providing his anthropologist with data.

    Personally, I'd be more inclined to give TIGHAR the benefit of the doubt if they didn't have a history of seemingly tying anything found on the island (shoe heel, knife blade, bottles, metal pieces, etc) to AE despite there being other explanations for the items being on the island...a colony in the late 30s, a Coast Guard LORAN station in WWII, and up to 100 people in the 1950s. Hardly an untouched place where items could have come from only the Lockheed and its occupants.

    It's also worthwhile to note the current release tones down their criticism of the original doctor who had the bones. In the past, I understand the group strongly questioned their competency and drinking habits on their website (citation needed...Correct me if I'm mistaken). UPDATE: while the initial news released was restrained, the 10 page report by RG (not the scientific report by Jantz on the bones) goes back into full attack mode questioning the competence and impartiality of the UK officials handing the bones. Again an example of RG's "if they don't agree with my opinion, they must be wrong".

    The release does not attempt to explain how an alive Amelia isn't spotted by US Navy search planes a week after her supposed landing or address how the aircraft, which after the landing was intact enough to send radio messages, disappeared so quickly.

    Back to the group's fundraising efforts: by going to the link, you can see several appeals for money...for the new Miller search, for the AE book mentioned above and three other "click here to support" links.
    I've seen many online news releases, I don't recall any being so strident in requesting funds (where applicable, that's usually on another page rather than embedded in a news item.).

    It will be interesting to see how much play this report gets in the regular media...and whether they accept it at face value or give conflicting information.
    Last edited by J Boyle; 9th February 2018 at 23:02.
    There are two sides to every story. The truth is usually somewhere between the two.

  22. #82
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Australia
    Posts
    138
    The Jantz Report...

    This then, is the headline grabbing blurb that J Boyle predicted in post #72 and which has been known to be forthcoming for nearly a couple of years.

    First off it must be realised that some dimensions were supplied to Jantz by Gillespie and his photogrammetry expert Glickman, the man who can see rivets on a blindingly reflective aluminum sheet in a fuzzy photo taken from at least 50 feet away and who was supposed to deliver a report on how that is possible but never has delivered it. Glickman has featured several times in the TIGHAR propensity of magic tricks by supplying various other reports to TIGHaR of varying intensity... It is said that the same qualifications scroll that he has can be bought from the Board that issues them for a princely sum on graduation. Together, for one, they needed to fix a height dimension which was required to be different from the Earhart Pilot Licence statement and for two, they needed a change of gender from the original report on "the bones found on Gardner Island" (now Nikumaroo) in 1940 and which were examined and measured by a New Zealand Doctor named Hoodless at the Medical School in Fiji.

    in all this, seemingly, no respect is given to the person who actually handled the 1940 bones or to the writings, measurements and sketches made by Doctor Hoodless at the time when he received the bones from Tarawa. Dr. Hoodless was responsible for the foundation of the Fiji Medical School and is respected to this day by Fijians. Hoodless gained his qualifications at Medical Schools in the U.K.

    Dr. Hoodless dimensioned and sketched the remnant of the Pelvic Arch and from that sketch it can be seen that the remnant is of a Male. That gender decision by Dr. Hoodless cannot be changed by any report. It will be interesting to see what Professor Wright of Sydney has to say about the Jantz Report.

    ....Also, Dr. Jantz uses the term "more similar" to describe the propensity he sees that the bones lean towards Earhart's bones as a degree of likeness.
    What does "more similar" mean ?.... never heard that term before in the English language, for "similar" can never be "the same".

    RPM...
    Last edited by RPM, FF, TGT...; 11th February 2018 at 04:57.

  23. #83
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,470
    WIX forum is strangely silent on this. That might explain why this group of individuals still manages to eke out a comfortable existence and take regular holidays in the Pacific. Folks need to wake up.

  24. #84
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,179
    I think some years ago TIGHAR threatened legal action against WIX, hence the lack of info there now

  25. #85
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    J Boyle asked if any of the articles in TIGHAR's latest newsletter were published in an accredited peer-reviewed journal.

    The answer is Yes, but ONLY as regards to Dr. Jantz's paper on the bones reanalysis (Forensic Anthropology, Vol. 1, No. 2). I think this is an important distinction, because once again, TIGHAR is trying to make what it's done seem like more than it really is. Gillespie's summary is headlined, "Special Issue - Three papers in academic format." He headlines all three "papers" as Research Articles.

    It's important to keep Jantz's effort distinct from the articles by Gillespie and Dr. Tom King, for the simple reason that other professionals with similar experience to Jantz's have reviewed his piece before publication, to ensure it conforms to best practices, to check for calculation errors, and to catch any shortfalls in logic, procedures, etc.

    Gillespie and King's articles have no such safeguards.

    I trust Dr. King to be dispassionate and analytical, because he is a trained scientist of long tenure who has extensive experience in research and analysis. He doesn't attempt to oversell the artifacts that TIGHAR has found on Nikumaroro, but he does seem to favor the "must be from Earhart" school of thought. Gillespie's analysis on all the things the British did wrong regarding the Earhart search is anything but detached. But then, it was written by a guy with a bachelor's degree in history who has no training in research, analysis, etc. But as this newsletter shows, that doesn't slow him down at all.

    If anyone thinks this is quibbling, Gillespie's piece takes issue with numerous things, and to the extreme, regarding a couple of minor, minor errors in dates and whatnot in the Cross and Wright paper. (Among a lot of other things). So, fair is fair.

  26. #86
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Where you wish you were.
    Posts
    9,243
    Fouga23: "I think some years ago TIGHAR threatened legal action against WIX..."

    That in itself should tell you all you need to know about the group.
    Last edited by J Boyle; 9th February 2018 at 23:26.
    There are two sides to every story. The truth is usually somewhere between the two.

  27. #87
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Berkshire
    Posts
    490
    WIX, Yes it appears legal action was mentioned, see below.
    http://www.warbirdinformationexchang...p?f=16&t=56523

    But the 'T' word is not totally dead on WIX, just a bit lost in the vintage section, the same subject as this thread discussed.
    http://www.warbirdinformationexchang...p?f=16&t=66125
    Wide open & turning left

  28. #88
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    J Boyle said: "Back to the group's fundraising efforts: by going to the link, you can see several appeals for money...for the new Miller search, for the AE book mentioned above and three other "click here to support" links.
    I've seen many online news releases, I don't recall any being so strident in requesting funds (where applicable, that's usually on another page rather than embedded in a news item.)."


    At TIGHAR, it seems to be about the money, although the group doesn't actually spend much on fundraising per se. Looking at the last three years, TIGHAR spent a little over $1.8 million. Some 45 percent of that was spent on its various projects (the exact amount is hard to figure out with certainty from the tax forms). Many US non-profits spend up to 90 percent - or more - of the money they raise on the programs they provide. TIGHAR spends not quite half.

    The next-highest expenditure is salaries, 35 percent of the total, more than $600,000 in three years. More than one-third of all the money spent goes to Gillespie, Thrasher and the handful of temporary helpers they use.

    The third highest expenditure is for legal costs, more than $134,000. I am at a loss as to why such a small non-profit needs to spend that kind of money on legal issues - the last thing I recall being publicly discussed was Tim Mellon's federal fraud lawsuit; that was some time ago. Occupancy, the fourth-largest expenditure, 6 percent of the total, should also be considered as going directly to Gillespie and Thrasher, since it's their house TIGHAR is being charged rent for.

    I find myself wondering, again, how much analysis or how many outside experts could be hired for more than $130,000, let alone the $107,000 spent on rent, to get actual answers to some of the questions TIGHAR is asking, as opposed to promised reports that never arrive. The pie chart below is instructive:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TIGHAR_major_expenses.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	39.7 KB 
ID:	258877
    Last edited by MFowler; 11th February 2018 at 20:41.

  29. #89
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Where you wish you were.
    Posts
    9,243
    From my time in the UK, I recall there are various charity watchdog groups.
    Although US-based, they certainly solicit funds and members in the UK.

    Based on what's been presented here, can they be reported to a UK agency?

    To answer the question of how they spend £100,000 a year on legal costs?
    Perhaps writing letters to forums as suggested on post 84?
    Last edited by J Boyle; 11th February 2018 at 01:32.
    There are two sides to every story. The truth is usually somewhere between the two.

  30. #90
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    21
    RPM, FF, TGT ... said, "What next is the question ? If I recall what was said when Dear Leader moved to PA from Delaware, the arrangement with what was named "Lochaber Farm" was a lease for five years and then the property was to be paid out and then it became fully owned. The expectation at the time was that the Electra was going to be found and all would be hunky-dory. That didn't quite work so "ACME Removals" may be needed again shortly...!"

    Here's a quote from Gillespie in 2015 from TIGHAR's forums: "Another common misconception is that Ric and Pat own the 11 acre farm that serves as TIGHAR HQ. Two years ago we sold the split-level house in Delaware from which we had run TIGHAR for 21 years because the organization had outgrown that property. We worked out an arrangement with a TIGHAR member who agreed to purchase a suitable property and lease it to us for five years after which we or TIGHAR would purchase it from him. The move lowered TIGHAR overhead and significantly improved efficiency. We used the proceeds from the sale of our house to pay off old debt. We now do not own property nor do we have savings or a retirement account. Our commitment to TIGHAR is absolute."

    I can't make sense of the statement, "We worked out an arrangement with a TIGHAR member who agreed to purchase a suitable property and lease it to us for five years after which we or TIGHAR would purchase it from him."

    How can TIGHAR as an organization buy anything from anyone right now, since the net assets on the 2015 tax form showed a MINUS $375,724 balance??? That's a pretty deep financial hole for a small non-profit. In the last 15 years, TIGHAR has spent about $184,000 more than it has taken in. If the proceeds from the sale of the Delaware house were used to pay off "old debt," as Gillespie states, there must have been considerably more debt at some point, right?

    The only way Gillespie and Thrasher can buy the farm is if they have been banking a considerable amount of their salary. It's possible, I suppose, since that totals more than $1 million in the last five years alone. I'm not sure TIGHAR's membership realizes that their organization is potentially on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars.
    Last edited by MFowler; 13th February 2018 at 21:49.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES