Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: This Months Flypast Magazine

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006

    This Months Flypast Magazine

    Anyone else notice the unfortunate description in the Havoc Story? The image was described as something like a stunning or superb image of the Havoc at war or similar ( I haven't got the copy with me) when the unfortunate image is actually showing the death of a Havoc crew.

    This one

    Sequence below

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire
    I have it in front of me, it says "Spectacular image of a 312th Bomb Group A-20G at work, New Guinea, 1944." A strange caption given it's a widely known photo. Most people familiar with the photo knows it's the moment that a crew died.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    That's it, it struck me as what a thing to say about an image showing two known crew dying.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Flypast magazine has become an UTTERLY amateur publication in my experience. It’s become comic book in both content and presentation in the last decade or so, more than ever before.
    I’ll await the flaming by the diehards.
    Last edited by Piston; 11th October 2017 at 23:39.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Scottish Borders
    You are very far from wrong there. I was a Flypast reader from the very start and looked forward to every issue but I buy it now only very occasionally. Sometimes I see a news story or an article only Flypast would include but largely its overall quality is poor. I do think Aeroplane Monthly has come on leaps and bounds in the last couple of years but it lacks the breadth of news stories in Flypast. I do wonder for how much longer Flypast and Aeroplane will continue as separate publications given their broadly similar target readership.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Where you wish you were.
    After reading the story, it came across to me that an editor...or layout person in charge of captions...did't realize the photo showed an aircraft hitting the water, mistaking it for a bomb blast.

    I might be wrong, but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.
    There are two sides to every story. The truth is usually somewhere between the two.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Cambridge, Duxfordshire
    My guess it's only the fact that Key sell twice as much advertising with two magazines that keeps them separate. This can only work if enough people buy both publications (hence the alternate timing of publication). If they pitch it right, they may well be able to do a 'best of both' but it would need more advertising and would need to cost more to sustain revenue, as they won't double readership that way. Not saying that cutting out some of the weaker stuff while adopting the more grown-up tone of Aeroplane applied to Flypast's breadth wouldn't make it worth a punt to some people (like me) who buy neither at the moment.
    It's all good. Probably.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    I rarely buy either now, only if there is an article that interests me. I used to read the news pages avidly but with forums and social media there's far more news available as it happens so by the time it hits the magazine, it's several weeks old!

    I did like the article on the DW1 in Aeroplane though


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


- Part of the    Network -