Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 2891011121314 LastLast
Results 331 to 360 of 409

Thread: RAF Museum Hendon - Closure / Dispersion of Battle of Britain Hall

  1. #331
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    pi::
    Posts
    3,424
    Meant to be going to Southampton.
    pb::

  2. #332
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    The one from the Battle-of-Britain hall at Hendon?

    Is it a loan to 'Solent Sky' then (who I think already have a Walrus under restoration)?

    If you think that's a loss to the RAF Museum Battle-of-Britain story then you must be gutted that they gave away a mint Do-24 recently...

    ...at about the same time all the fuss was being made over the Do-17 recovery.
    Last edited by Creaking Door; 7th September 2017 at 23:17.
    WA$.

  3. #333
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    pi::
    Posts
    3,424
    The DO24 and Mosquito went overseas 25 years ago.

    The Seagull was displayed next to the Sunderland, Lysander and V2.
    pb::

  4. #334
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    253
    That Do-24 definitely didn't go that long ago! (Did it?!?)

  5. #335
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    The Do-24 was on 'long term loan' (17 years I think, followed by another 17 year option)...

    ...but it was only 'given' to a Dutch museum this year.
    Last edited by Creaking Door; 8th September 2017 at 14:11.
    WA$.

  6. #336
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    Blimey, where did ten years go to?

    https://forum.keypublishing.com/show...for-RAF-Museum

    Ironic really, considering what I was saying about Hendon being the place to commemorate the Battle-of-Britain!
    WA$.

  7. #337
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    4,414
    The Walrus/Seagull is at RAFM Stafford at the mo. Wings folded.

    I was surprised they gave the DO24 away but I suppose it was gifted to them by the Spanish so no real option other than a swap? More relevant to the Dutch anyway TBH!
    Our Beech 18 & T-6@www.beechrestorations.com
    Visit Sywell Aviation Museum @
    www.sywellaerodrome.co.uk/museum.php
    Sywell Airshow 17.8.2014

  8. #338
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    So long as the RAF Museum doesn't decide that the Bf-110, Ju-87, Me-410, Ju-88, etc, etc...

    ...are more relevant to the Germans!!!
    WA$.

  9. #339
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Stamford Lincs
    Posts
    9,959
    Yes but you could argue the Me410 is far more interesting to the German people than the British.

  10. #340
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    pi::
    Posts
    3,424
    A swap for something relevant would be ok. I just dont see the point on off loading a/c with nothing gained.
    pb::

  11. #341
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cambridge, Duxfordshire
    Posts
    3,481
    Relevance is all about the story you are trying to tell. So a 110 is relevant next to a Lancaster or a Hurricane. Whether in Britain, Germany or Ghana. If the story becomes muddled - losing a dedicated BoB hall is an example of this - then the relevance of the 'illustrations' is lost. Frankly, if its not telling the true story of the RAF - opponents and all - then I am not sure what it is for.

  12. #342
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    201

    RAFM Do24

    I am very willing to be corrected, but when it arrived (IIRC late 70's?) I seem to recall being told that it was on loan. This was about the time that "de facto" the RAFM was seeing itself as the core of a national collection, with the Do 24 offering an interesting technical contrast to the Stranraer.

  13. #343
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    ...and the Elgin Marbles are more 'interesting' to the Greeks!

    Carry on with that particular train of thought and there's going to be no shortage of space in an awful lot of British museums and art-galleries!
    WA$.

  14. #344
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    pi::
    Posts
    3,424
    The Casa built Jungman was a gift from General Franco. Its relevance was dubious to say the least!
    pb::

  15. #345
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Stamford Lincs
    Posts
    9,959
    Technically unique items I believe should be put where they belong. I imagine the vast majority of visitors have a minor interest in items like the Me410 and two seat FW190. I would much rather have aircraft like a Spitfire PRXI and the Cotton Lockheed Electra Junior in the collection.

    As to the Jungmann -it came to the U.K in return for assistance with the build of a Cierva C.30 in Spain.

  16. #346
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    559
    I have quite a bit of sympathy in the argument for returning significant aircraft to their homeland. given certain conditions. Sadly, because of history, the UK would not have a great deal to gain from such a policy.

  17. #347
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    I would much rather have aircraft like a Spitfire PRXI...
    Yes, because what the RAF Museum really needs is a line-up of a dozen or so Spitfires...

    ...how is that going to interest 'the vast majority of visitors'?

    Sorry, but the RAF Museum cannot just be a dry mausoleum of every type of aircraft that the RAF has ever operated; yes, it would be my policy to obtain (or replicate) every one as the opportunity arose but not at the expense of other, in many cases unique, aircraft that the RAF did not operate...

    ...the story of the Spitfire cannot be told without the Messerschmitt!
    WA$.

  18. #348
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    pi::
    Posts
    3,424
    I have no issue with trading aircraft or in certain cases, artifacts. I dont see how we benefit when a Mosquito, spitfire XIX and Seagull depart while nothing replaces them.
    pb::

  19. #349
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    I'm all for an 'aggressive' short-term loan policy; it keeps a museum interesting, vibrant and makes it more of a commercial proposition. It also allows 'space' to be created, helps other museums and generates publicity which ultimately brings in visitors...

    ...but irreplaceable aircraft are the currency of these transactions; without them you don't get to play!
    WA$.

  20. #350
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Not far from here!
    Posts
    1,726
    QUOTE " Is it a loan to 'Solent Sky' then (who I think already have a Walrus under restoration)?"

    Creaking Door.

    Solent Sky disposed of their Walrus a long time ago and it is in private ownership undergoing long term restoration to airworthy standard, at Audley End.
    "Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."(Mary Baker Eddy)

  21. #351
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    I have quite a bit of sympathy in the argument for returning significant aircraft to their homeland...
    Except where their 'homeland' was formerly Nazi Germany (or the Japanese Empire). I'm sorry, but these aircraft, although technically fascinating, are far too powerful as symbols of wartime victories...

    ...and defeats; historically it is important that these 'war prizes' remain as such.
    WA$.

  22. #352
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    Solent Sky disposed of their Walrus a long time ago and it is in private ownership undergoing long term restoration to airworthy standard, at Audley End.
    Maybe I've got this the wrong way round but I thought the private airworthy restoration had been abandoned and the Walrus had been taken-on by a museum (I assumed Solent Sky).....I could be wrong?

    Yep.....wrong.....I stand corrected!

    I'm obviously a bit out of date but wasn't the same aircraft was in private ownership before, under restoration (to airworthy standards), before it was purchased by Solent Sky?
    Last edited by Creaking Door; 8th September 2017 at 22:50.
    WA$.

  23. #353
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Glorious Souffff
    Posts
    5,096
    Ironic.....a plate issued by RAFM to commemorate the opening of the Battle of Britain Museum by the Queen Mother in 1978

    Opened in time for the 40th anniversary, did not even stay open for 36 years. I'm still p'd off with the RAFM management.


    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Opening-of...IAAOSw~qNZiOQO

  24. #354
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Glorious Souffff
    Posts
    5,096
    Still this RAFM web page is disingenuous with the truth. I make no apologies for going on about this.

    https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/...tain-hall.aspx

  25. #355
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Stamford Lincs
    Posts
    9,959
    An addition of a Spitfire PRXI would be nothing to do with adding to a line up of Spitfires. It would be to add depth to the massively neglected story of reconnaissance - the days of aircraft museums adding machines to just add further airframes should be long over.

    As to the 'war prizes' - unique airframes add little to our heritage and the vast majority of visitors will view it as just another airframes. The notion that they signify a 'victory' should be long gone - they are technical examples and far more valuable and interesting in their country of origin. A prime example of this is the Kawasaki Ki100 - it had a minor influence in the overall campaign and it would be far better served on display in Japan with a 'Zero' taking its place here.

  26. #356
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    846
    hi morning,
    thankfully farnboroughrob quiet true, and if not for the the RAF during the B of B ( and that's what the B of B hall commemorates by showing "us and them" ), we would now be asking frau Merkel to
    return a Spitfire or Lancaster to its homeland...

  27. #357
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    62
    Does anyone know when the Typhoon returns from Canada?

  28. #358
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    559
    I feel the whole war prizes thing is so last century. We have to remember that the vast majority of visitors have never even met anybody who served in WW2 and it is probably not a personal thing to them. They just see the history without the emotion of older people. The issue of possibly loaning some of the former BofB aircraft to Germany would be one for the sensitivities of that country, I would rather see aircraft on loan than in a dusty store. What I would like to see at the RAFM is actually showing what it was like to be a WOP, Nav, or gunner in a Lancaster, or Halifax on a mission with some walk through replica exhibits. The FAAM have the excellent carrier experience, would be good to see some sort of aircrew experience at Hendon or Cosford.

  29. #359
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    The FAA Museum 'carrier experience' is dire.....meanwhile, all the real carriers (and virtually all the other warships) have gone off to the breaker's yard!

    This country practically invented carrier-aviation, and we've certainly had our share of successes with carriers (and more recently than most), but you wouldn't know that from our lack of attempts to preserve them!
    WA$.

  30. #360
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,642
    An addition of a Spitfire PRXI would.....add depth to the massively neglected story of reconnaissance...
    Fair enough, I agree, but how can you dismiss a 'war prize' as 'just another aircraft' to the vast majority of visitors?

    I'll guarantee to you that 'the vast majority of visitors' will have more chance of differentiating between a Spitfire and a Messerschmitt than between two (or is it five?) slightly different marks of Spitfire...

    ...apart from the PR Spitfire is a nice shade of blue?
    WA$.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES