Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 181 to 198 of 198

Thread: Japan Self-Defense Forces - News & Discussion - Season 1

  1. #181
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,642
    Right! if Japan has come to the conclusion that it can't go it alone with the next fighter project, does that automatically mean they are heading to LM for a Japanese F22?

    Isn't that a bit linear?

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    121
    I wonder if that ends UK involvement? what does that Turkish guy have to say? lol.

    yeah LM is likely. but I feel it might be more towards an F-35 variant..

    but who knows, in the past some other foreign countries have worked with US companies on losing or unused designs.
    Spain and Principe de asturias comes to mind.

    Here's hoping they look at Northrop for the YF-23 or Boink for the X-32. I do recall one of their F-3 concepts, it was 23DMU or 24DMU, that looked like a smaller YF-23

  3. #183
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,642
    It's all hot air at the moment and I think the talk of going to LM is partly driven by the help they received with the F2, the fact they wanted the F22, the fact they bought the F35 etc.

    The UK/Japan situation will be slightly less murky when the Future air strategy gets published. The main problem with working with Japan is purely the tendency for them to fall back on US involvement. That said, the F2 was pursued despite the fact it would have been cheaper/easier to buy American.

    I can't see the UK government working with Turkey to produce a fighter if only because the needs and expectations are different.

  4. #184
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,642
    A new, more detailed RFI has been sent to London and Washington for help with the F3:

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...n-designs.html

    Is London's inclusion just a nod towards burgeoning defence ties, or are they actually interested in what BAE etc have to offer?

  5. #185
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Columbia, MD
    Posts
    12,132
    There has been an increase in the level of their cooperation with London so it makes some sense for them to include BAE in the mix although if this path is pursued this will likely be Lockheed/Boeing's to lose given the NatSec ties between the US and Japan.
    Old radar types never die; they just phased array

  6. #186
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,997
    Let's say Japan wanted a J-20 counter. Would it opt for something more compact, say in 20,000 kg class, or go head to head in a 30,000 kg class?

    As interesting as a scaled down YF-23 using twin F414 sounds, I have a suspicion Japan is going for something F-22A comparable.
    Go Huskers!

  7. #187
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,682
    A new, more detailed RFI has been sent to London and Washington for help with the F3:

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...n-designs.html

    Is London's inclusion just a nod towards burgeoning defence ties, or are they actually interested in what BAE etc have to offer?
    Hmmmm, that looks suspiciously like "we are going to buy more F-35A´s, lets send a memo to Boeing and BAE just to maintain LM on its toes".

    Cheers

  8. #188
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Columbia, MD
    Posts
    12,132
    lets send a memo to Boeing and BAE just to maintain LM on its toes".
    Quite possibly. I am not sure co-developing an aircraft is in Japan's best interest. These deals are extremely tricky, and usually prolong the development timelines given the politics of each nation. You then also end up with a situation where no partner agrees to work-share continent on a fixed number of aircraft purchased allowing them to delay or defer purchase but yet still reap the rewards of industrial partnership like what is happening with the JSF. It would be best if they seek consultation or even a design partner from either US or UK but take the lead in funding the project and absorb majority of the industrial work within their industry. Lockheed has in the past acknowledged working on an F-35 derivative as a lower risk US Navy NGF proposal so perhaps they can offer something similar given that the US Navy has moved its own plans for the FA-XX to the right.
    Old radar types never die; they just phased array

  9. #189
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,642
    I would say that the potential shared ground for the UK and Japan is fairly obvious- timelines, operational need and technical abilities dovetail quite nicely. I don't think the UK will repeat the Eurofighter experience with France/Germany etc, the Turkish fighter is not what the UK will want or need and that leaves us with a joint project with the US.

    The latter is undesirable because it is likely that we will be involved in producing F35s for over a generation and the chance of any sovereign design work is slim on a future US led F22/Typhoon replacement project.

    As to Japan not wanting to upset the US with a UK/Japanese project: the F22 was denied them, so they bought the F35 (and will likely do so again) without any resistance. That is an established procurement route that will be ongoing for decades. Why should they buy more US equipment than that? Is Japan a US colony?

  10. #190
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Columbia, MD
    Posts
    12,132
    As to Japan not wanting to upset the US with a UK/Japanese project: the F22 was denied them, so they bought the F35 (and will likely do so again) without any resistance. That is an established procurement route that will be ongoing for decades. Why should they buy more US equipment than that? Is Japan a US colony?
    I don't think it would be because they do not want to upset the US. Their is a treaty between the two nations and they already cooperate on some very vital national-security and defense projects. They also have a history of closely working with these very same OEMs on a host of programs (F-15J, F-2, F-35 etc etc) and past relationships do matter. Then there is also a matter of experience of working on advanced systems which at least in the case of Lockheed, is significantly greater than the competition.
    Last edited by bring_it_on; 13th March 2018 at 13:59.
    Old radar types never die; they just phased array

  11. #191
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Cemetery Junction
    Posts
    13,557
    Japan & the USA co-operate on many defence projects, but Japan also co-operates to a lesser degree with other countries. It's very interested in the Meteor missile for, example, & is working with the UK on a possible development of it with a Japanese seeker. It's put British gas turbines in its warships, bought radar technology from Thales, & so on.

    But Sintra could be right, & it's a Korean-style "remind the Yanks that there are alternatives so they don't try to rip us off".
    Juris praecepta sunt haec: honeste vivere, alterum non laedere, suum cuique tribuere.
    Justinian

  12. #192
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,642
    So, the LM proposal is a hybrid of the F22 and F35 but that is a new aircraft.

    If you take the 1980s design of the F22 and put the 1990s F35 bits into it then how is that an aircraft that sustains Japanese industry for the next half century?

    The aircraft has to be a new design with new technology surely?

    I have no expectation that BAE are going to offer a Typhoon derivative or that Boeing are going to offer the SH in any form.

  13. #193
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
    Posts
    1,280
    The US Air Force wants to receive F / A-XX, but the Japanese should pay for its development

    Name:  ngf (7).jpg
Views: 558
Size:  96.1 KB

  14. #194
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    "Where the fruit is"
    Posts
    5,329
    (transplanted here)

    the point is that the F-22 isn't produced anymore anywhere. Taking the airframe as a base to customize a fighter specific to Japan needs will de-facto not impair their own industry.
    Fielding the 22 as the source airframe could be a guarantee to leave aside a lot of the inherent cost of a new design (think airframe, stealth. weapon integration...) while sticking to the expectations of Japan in term of greater range. Then, Japanese designed engines and systems can be fielded etc.. This might even include the UK industry.

    Think Kfir and Cheetahs.

  15. #195
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4,966
    put the 1990s F35 bits into it
    The only thing in the F-35 from the 1990's is the "idea" of an F-35".

    Everything, especially the avionics, in the F-35 is in a constant state of development/improvement. It just got new CPUs with Block 3i, will get newer ones in Block 4.1 (to increase capacity 4x), got new radar modules in 3i (and again is due for newer ones), getting a new EOTS, EODAS, etc.
    "The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."

  16. #196
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,642
    Fair point. But if you take average point of 80s F22 and naughties F35, thats still 90s


  17. #197
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,642
    FlightGlobal article on the reuters story:

    https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...er-jet-447911/

  18. #198
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Hong Kong SAR, PRC
    Posts
    3,389
    Sunday, 22 July 2018:
    B-747 x 2.
    JASDF, based at Chitose AB, Hokkaidou.

    VIP planes for Emperor and Prime Minister.
    Open to public before they retire during this fiscal year.

    25 years old.

    Two successors are B-777.
    One planned to arrive at Chitose AB, in late August, after flight tests outside Japan.
    Another planned to arrive in December.

    https://www3.nhk.or.jp/sapporo-news/...2/0001473.html
    Republic of Korea Air Force KF-16 missing photographs

    http://www.f-16.net/aircraft-databas...irforce/ROKAF/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES