Register Free

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
Profile Picture
eagle1
Rank 5 Registered User
Last Activity: 28th August 2018, 11:00
Joined: 13th February 2011
Location:
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • If you refer to the exhaustive video on the conference held on the SCAF program (see on SCAF thread) TEMPEST and SCAF have the exact same approach (system of sytem) and feature the same tricks & systems. I was personnaly struck that even the "wording" seems the same in both program. There is obviously a common...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by eagle1; 28th August 2018, 09:59.

    Leave a comment:


  • If the UK fail to attract partners for Tempest, it will be in a good position to join SCAF albeit not in a lead position. Regarding engine technology they would certainly bring a significant contribution which could be a good leverage to negotiate a nice share of the program.
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • You forgot the Franco-Greman SCAF in the options. The UK would have much more clout with the SCAF than with the NGAD + Airbus is willing to partner with BAE.
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • I wouldn't discard the possibility of joining US NGAD or Franco-German SCAF if they don't find foreign partners. Tempest program is a bet. And even if the UK fails to attract foreign partners it would be in a better position to negotiate a bigger share in NGAD or SCAF, but they will have to abdicate the lead in...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More

 

Working...
X