Register Free

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Airbus: European Future Fighter Program

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Ryan,

    there is literally no evidence that the UK is more likely to build a fighter with Japan than Turkey or any other country.

    The only certainty in the UK at the moment is that everything is up in the air, and if there is a change of government, the likelihood of any defence projects being funded or supported drops to non-existent.

    Comment


      #62
      Call it a hunch. Note existing co-operation with Japan on a new version of Meteor.

      And things being up in the air? You talking about Turkey or the UK there? We have a stable democratic process here regardless of who gets in, or how close the result is.

      Comment


        #63
        You cannot honestly say EJ200 is better than M88.3 when neither one implemented all the cutting edge techniques. The EJ200 is the better back end and materials technology. The M88.3 has the better front stages and goes a bit beyond the EJ200 with its extra bypass. Neither engine is a peer of F135 technology.
        Go Huskers!

        Comment


          #64
          Sintra said:

          In Europe alone there are more than one thousand airframes that will need replacement in the thirties and fourties, its common sense to pool Europe's resources in order to develop and field that replacement.
          except that "pooling resources" is the best way to waste money, while pooling is supposed to be about sparing some..

          you can't have competitive offers if you have no competition to force the companies to do it... and what's more, it would be good if the claims about "european" stuff stopped as there's no entity that could be considered as "europe" as such... there are countries qui coexist on european continent inside a web of agreements that every country tries to take advantage of.. as a result, you have fiascos like the Typhoon whose production is so explosed all over the continent for political reasons that it just is a waste of money and time (the development is hampered for years now by the fight between those who want to go forward and those who do not)

          You can have partnerships between a couple of countries who share similar doctrines and needs, but that would have Germans partner with Swedes and, eventually Switzerland, not France or UK

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Sintra View Post
            You are entirely correct. Lockheed and Boeing will be delighted if Europe doesnt get its act together.
            There's absolutely no reason why Europe cant emulate what it did in the missile, the comercial aircraft area, the helicopter and the space business. The market is there, the resources are there (for crying out loud, even in this "almost nill defense budget" times, Western Europe spends three times more than Russia!), the industry is there. Do an "MBDA" out of Dassault and Airbus, get some realistic KKP's, throw in 35 billion euros in R&D, wait till 2035 and serve the dam thing with white wine.
            What it cant happen is having three european xerox airframes that do the same bloody thing.
            EU does not have three times money of Russia to spend on defence. Infact both EF and Rafale lines will closed down without exports. How is that Gripen doing and that so called small awacs.
            Airbus can't afford anything better than A320. Even that need alot imports.
            Russia at this point does not need exports to India and China to procure several thousands of its own fighters. for EU export is main thing and consider lack of military power it is coming at cost that out weigh benefit .

            Comment


              #66
              Why would Europe need 1000 fighter planes in addition to one they will have on hand. The reason they keep bring up European army is cut spending even more. 500 is more realistic number and drop to F22 numbers of 150-200 is very possible. 2040 is along way away and trying to predict stable defense numbers is basing projections upon fairy tales. Doing that is sure way to see the cost death spiral to rear its head.

              Comment


                #67
                JSR are you kidding? Russia is an economical dwarf when compared to EU.

                Comment


                  #68
                  You cannot honestly say EJ200 is better than M88.3 when neither one implemented all the cutting edge techniques. The EJ200 is the better back end and materials technology. The M88.3 has the better front stages and goes a bit beyond the EJ200 with its extra bypass. Neither engine is a peer of F135 technology.
                  Snecma M88-3 is only around as a prototype just as EJ230/XG-40-2. At the time the choice was EJ200 or 17,000lbf M88-2 and even the M88-3 doesn't beat any of the core parameters set by the EJ200, thrust to weight no better, SFC no lower. And yes, I can say the EJ200 was definitely better, and that's what the other 3 EF partners also said. And you can't seriously compare an engine that was flying 20+ years ago with the F135. The EJ200 was first ran in 1991. The JSF competition didn't even start until 1996 and the X-35 wasn't selected until 2001. You're talking about a time gap of 15 years.
                  Last edited by Ryan; 17th June 2017, 09:49.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    I think France will join the effort, sooner rather than later. They got a new Pro-Europe president and they will have to get going with a new generation platform.

                    Sure Rafale is an excellent platform with more to give, but reality is still there. The aim is to have the new platform ready by 2035 and by then Dassault's assembly lines should be pretty empty, at least at the french plant.

                    Partnering with Germany and Spain would also almost surly give the french the lead for the engines and the radar.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Russia's economy is smaller then Italy's...

                      Comment


                        #71
                        Airbus should invite the UK and Turkey into this program as they would get large orders from these 2 countries alone.

                        TuAF Present Inventory

                        240 x F-16 CCIP and Advanced Block 50+
                        49 x F-4/2020
                        32 x NF-5/2000

                        N.B. The TuAF have retired in excess of 80 F-4E

                        The TuAF has plans for:

                        116 x F-35 (to be introduced early 2018 onwards)
                        250 x TF-X (to be introduced from 2023 onwards)

                        Total: 366 Combat Aircraft

                        Future Turkish Requirements

                        Turkey currently has on order 1 LHD which will require 16 F-35 VTOL and another LHD planned which will require another 16 F-35's.
                        Turkey will also have fully operational bases in Qatar, Somalia, Dijibouti and Cyprus which will require combat aircraft to be stationed there.

                        Thus, Turkey will require approximately between 100 to 150 more combat aircraft to maintain their quantitative and qualitative advantage in the region 2040 onwards. Both the F-35 and TF-X would be about 20 years old then.

                        Comment


                          #72
                          250 x TF-X (to be introduced from 2023 onwards)
                          Good luck to the TF-X team in achieving that.
                          Old radar types never die; they just phased array

                          Comment


                            #73
                            Snecma M88-3 is only around as a prototype just as EJ230/XG-40-2. At the time the choice was EJ200 or 17,000lbf M88-2 and even the M88-3 doesn't beat any of the core parameters set by the EJ200, thrust to weight no better, SFC no lower. And yes, I can say the EJ200 was definitely better, and that's what the other 3 EF partners also said. And you can't seriously compare an engine that was flying 20+ years ago with the F135. The EJ200 was first ran in 1991. The JSF competition didn't even start until 1996 and the X-35 wasn't selected until 2001. You're talking about a time gap of 15 years.
                            Guess what? the FCAS -DP (the drone) engine is a M88 derivative made by RR/snecma joint venture. if you check characteristics, SFC, TW etc. are very similar between EJ200 and M88. Rest is operationnaly relevant (eg time from 0 to 100% thrust, air density response), but generally not advertized.

                            Comment


                              #74
                              because there's no "europe"

                              every country wants to keep its sovereignity, which means that they certainly won't accept that for the whole continent (except russian part) they have even less fighters than France has today by itself... not to speak that, once again, the doctrines are very different, between the franch who not unlike the USA don't hesitate much to go to the other side of the world to intervene and germans who, basically, stay at home??? not to speak about small countries who never even had anything ressembling a colony or any sort of force projection tradition

                              you just can't treat the europe as one entity.. the USA are one country, Europe is a continent with over 30 separate and independent countries on it

                              Comment


                                #75
                                bring_it_on
                                250 x TF-X (to be introduced from 2023 onwards)
                                Good luck to the TF-X team in achieving that.
                                Thats the official number according to many sources: https://www.aerosociety.com/news/tur...ary-aerospace/

                                Turkish Aerospace Industries produced 300 F-16's back in the 1980s under licence from Lockheed Martin.

                                The company has a lot of experience with large volume production.

                                In any event going by the average combat aircraft in the TuAF fleet (averages 400 combat aircraft)- Turkey will need to either produce 250 TF-X or procure another 250 combat aircraft from elsewhere.

                                Comment


                                  #76
                                  True but the politicians in Europe pushing things think different. They will sacrifice local industry on the alter of Europe. Then they will use a European army as a excuse to under invest in defense. Europe as whole doesn't need 1000 fighters in addition to those still on hand to defend it self. That is the reason why European countries are willing to let there defense spending fall bellow the 2% that they all agreed to.

                                  Comment


                                    #77
                                    It is great to see some nations will avoid falling into the F 35 black hole.

                                    Comment


                                      #78
                                      @mupp

                                      Russia's economy is not smaller than Italy's. That is just pure agitprop. When measuring with purchasing power parity, (includes production consumed internally) Russia has the 6th biggest economy in the world.

                                      Comment


                                        #79
                                        Originally posted by halloweene View Post
                                        JSR are you kidding? Russia is an economical dwarf when compared to EU.
                                        EU is always in short supply of money . Look at Galileo satellite cheap rides on Soyuz or Italy asking for helping in Libya or big gas development in Egypt. It's always the Russian firms that EU asking for money. I am sure with meltdown in Middleast the funding gap between EU and Russia will widen.

                                        Comment


                                          #80
                                          KGB
                                          It is great to see some nations will avoid falling into the F 35 black hole.
                                          Many countries invested in the F-35 not solely for defence purposes but also political purposes. Turkey for instance is stuck with the JSF program because if it withdraws now many will interpret this as a solidification of its move East. However, the TuAF are not entirely convinced that the F-35 will address all its operational needs and is thus looking for other complimentary fighter platforms. I think Europe is now also coming to realise this and is looking at alternatives.

                                          Furthermore, the air threats are also now changing rapidly and aircraft manufacturers need to address these.

                                          Comment


                                           

                                          Working...
                                          X