Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert

Collapse
X
Collapse
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Peter
    Moderator
    • Jan 2000
    • 12504

    Is it too late For Quattara to go back to the p40 resting spot to see if there are any remains hidden in the sand?
    Cheers,Peter
    "Merlins always drip oil, when they don't....worry!"

    Comment

    • l.garey
      Rank 5 Registered User
      • Feb 2006
      • 1951

      That's what I would like to do Peter.
      Laurence

      Comment

      • Peter
        Moderator
        • Jan 2000
        • 12504

        To me it would have seemed like the first place to look... out of respect for the family...
        Cheers,Peter
        "Merlins always drip oil, when they don't....worry!"

        Comment

        • TonyT
          Rank 5 Registered User
          • Oct 2006
          • 9021

          Would they need permission to test the remains, one could argue that until they were positively identified they could belong to anyone, therefore would the family need to be consulted?, common courtesy as they are aware of the remains would have been to let them know.

          Comment

          • l.garey
            Rank 5 Registered User
            • Feb 2006
            • 1951

            Common courtesy seems thin on the ground in this matter.
            Permission: maybe not formally, but in view of the fact that the family wants to know if the ARIDO bones are Dennis's, hopefully.
            Whatever, I hope the bones have not got lost. If so, it would not be the first time that bones from a crashed pilot disappeared.
            Last edited by l.garey; 27th March 2013, 17:23.
            Laurence

            Comment

            • Guest's Avatar
              Guest

              It would be interesting if our friends at ARIDO could be persuaded to come back to this forum and let us know the position from their perspective.

              If the bones have been recovered for DNA testing then one must conclude that the Italian team would have had to be involved. Otherwise, how would the MOD/Embassy/Egyptian authorities know where to find them?

              Comment

              • adrian_gray
                Which idiot let HIM in?
                • Jan 2000
                • 2980

                I believe - I'll cite what I recall in a mo - that hot, dry conditions are very bad for DNA preservation, so it is unfortunately a possibility that any recovered remains may not contain recoverable or analysable DNA. That said, the byzantine shenanigans going on around what may or may not have been recovered is pretty disappointing. Can we not find an American connection for Dennis Copping, and get their MIA teams involved?

                I canot now find a source, but I recall reading that hot, dry conditions are bad for DNA preservation as a result of an interest in a unit in Oxford set up to study ancient DNA (somewhere I would have loved to have worked). Their director then decamped to Sydney to set up a similar facility there, and the Oxford unit closed. This turned out to be a bad career move, as Australian conditions, as opposed to those of cold damp Europe, do not preserve DNA well.

                I'm happy to be proved wrong (indeed, I hope that sooner, rather than later, I am, for the sake of Dennis Copping's family and those who knew him), but unfortunately DNA analysis is dependent on a great many things, especially having DNA in a condition that allows analysis, and isn't a magic bullet.

                Adrian
                "Snow clearing equipment has been found under snowdrift" - message sent from RNAS Hatston, Orkney, 1944.

                Comment

                • l.garey
                  Rank 5 Registered User
                  • Feb 2006
                  • 1951

                  It is true that hot, dry conditions may lead to degradation of DNA, but that has not stopped people sequencing DNA from Egyptian mummies. After hundreds or thousands of years the DNA will certainly be degraded, but it is usually possible to go a long way to identifying sequences that can be compared with, for example, DNA from possibly related persons. In the case of the Egyptian Kittyhawk, the bones that were found had only been there for about 70 years (if they are those of the pilot, which is not sure). I am very surprised to hear from the Defence Attach that the bones were unsuitable for DNA testing. That suggests that if any testing was done it was not on Flt Sgt Copping's remains, but rather something much older. We just do not know.

                  But what worries me most is that the original discoverers of the bones last year say that they left them in the desert and that they were not recovered since. That is the real mystery to me. Sadly the Defence Attach tells me he cannot answer any more questions, and so I cannot know who did the testing, when or how.
                  Laurence

                  Comment

                  • Guest's Avatar
                    Guest

                    As I understand it, the Defence Attache is saying that DNA was not recoverable but information from the Italian team is stating that the bones must still be in the desert because nobody has asked them where they are! And only they know.

                    In effect, we could be looking at a repeat performance of the episode where the MOD stated the bones were over 400 years old and thus could not be Flt Sgt Copping. That was exposed as incorrect information and the MOD had to admit/apologise to the family for the fact that the bones had not been recovered and therefore there was no earthly way anybody could know if it was Flt Sgt Copping or not - let alone that they were over 400 years old.

                    If the bones have not been recovered (as I believe the Italians are insisting) then there cannot be any way that a statement to the effect that DNA is non-recoverable can possibly be made. That seems to be the position. That and the fact that the Defence Attache has simply refused to deal with queries on the matter stating: "Case closed".

                    Somebody (again) would appear to be making untruthful or misleading statements.

                    Comment

                    • l.garey
                      Rank 5 Registered User
                      • Feb 2006
                      • 1951

                      What I was told was that analysis of the bones by the Egyptian medical authorities indicated that it was not possible for DNA to be extracted, which assumes that the bones were recovered. Now, if what is meant is that the authorities said that DNA was not extractable because of the bones still being in the desert, being too old and dry, or simply inaccessible, then that is a different matter and someone should make it clear. Are the bones still near the wreck site and their unsuitability for identification purely surmise?
                      Laurence

                      Comment

                      • Guest's Avatar
                        Guest

                        I see what you mean.

                        The fact that DNA is deemed not recoverable may be simply because the bones have not been recovered or are deemed non-recoverable.

                        A slight economy of facts, if so, but thus not untruthful or incorrect - even if a tad disingenuous.

                        Comment

                        • l.garey
                          Rank 5 Registered User
                          • Feb 2006
                          • 1951

                          I wonder! I have contacted the MOD and await a reply after 9 April!
                          Laurence

                          Comment

                          • dko
                            dko
                            Rank 5 Registered User
                            • Nov 2012
                            • 94

                            Perhaps the reasons why the authorities did not consider appropriate to do DNA test on the bones found is because there are no elements and items relating to Copping (no complete skeleton, no clothes, no military badges etc..)
                            Given that the desert is a cemetery in the open and in this region was also lost the army of Cambyses (50,000 people) for this the discovery of human bones is frequent...... then the skepticism of the authorities !

                            Comment

                            • pat1968
                              Rank 5 Registered User
                              • Apr 2004
                              • 260

                              So if i have understood correctly the MOD have told the Family that the bones discovered by the Italians have been deemed "unsuitable for DNA analysis". Like most people (and the family!) I assumed that this meant the bones had been recovered to a laboratory and an unsuccessful attempt made to extract DNA. Now it transpires that in fact no one has either asked for or been given the location of the remains, making it highly unlikely that they have actually been recovered. So despite the fact that a fragment of parachute was discovered at that location it may well be that the decision has been made not to recover or test the remains as there is not enough circumstantial evidence that they are those of Dennis Copping?
                              If this is the case this is simply unacceptable, to quote a member of Dennis Coppings' family "they found a fragment of parachute with the bones what more do they need?"
                              I find this whole situation extraordinary!
                              Last edited by pat1968; 28th March 2013, 19:46.
                              "Only the dead see the end of the war" Plato

                              www.hawkerhind.com

                              Comment

                              • l.garey
                                Rank 5 Registered User
                                • Feb 2006
                                • 1951

                                That seems to be the situation Pat. I still do not know if the bones were actually recovered or if the announced decision (to me and the family) that DNA could not be be extracted was taken without proper laboratory examination. As I said above, the Defence Attach in Cairo will not answer more questions, and the MOD contact in the UK will only respond after 9 April. I do not know why they cannot be more forthcoming.
                                Laurence

                                Comment

                                • Guest's Avatar
                                  Guest

                                  From all that I have learned (in considerable detail) about this case away from the forum, and how it has been handled, only one word comes to mind; shocking. And that is a woefully inadequate description.

                                  Comment

                                  • jack windsor
                                    Rank 5 Registered User
                                    • Dec 2008
                                    • 921

                                    Forgive me if I,ve missed something only just come out of hospital,but what is the significance of the 9th April date quoted a couple of times above?.Is that the end of our embassy,s easter hols?.

                                    regards
                                    jack...

                                    Comment

                                    • l.garey
                                      Rank 5 Registered User
                                      • Feb 2006
                                      • 1951

                                      Jack: good that you are out of hospital!
                                      You may be right about the Easter holidays (for MOD, rather than Embassy). It was the date given to me by the MOD executive I wrote to to ask for details of what the h... was going on. She said she would reply after 9 April. More news soon, I hope.
                                      Laurence

                                      Comment

                                      • jack windsor
                                        Rank 5 Registered User
                                        • Dec 2008
                                        • 921

                                        thanks for that,could I also ask should have done in my other post but only thought about it after I,d hit the send button!was not more info going to be forth coming after a talk somewhere in the US by someone from the IWM about the recovery of the P.40?

                                        regards
                                        jack...

                                        Comment

                                        • l.garey
                                          Rank 5 Registered User
                                          • Feb 2006
                                          • 1951

                                          I think tangmere followed that story. Can he comment?
                                          Laurence

                                          Comment

                                          Unconfigured Ad Widget

                                          Collapse

                                           

                                          Working...
                                          X