Read the forum code of contact
By: - 11th May 2016 at 17:08 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
A non story. I wear them all the time, especially when I'm attending Price Waterhouse to check my financial portfolio.
By: - 12th May 2016 at 08:35 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
Yes, damn this sexism...
...it is about time that attractive, twenty-seven year-old, actresses, temping as receptionists, were chosen for their academic and vocational skills rather than what they look like in high heels!
All this publicity (six months after the event) is probably going to do her acting career no good at all either!
By: - 12th May 2016 at 10:10 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
A non story. I wear them all the time, especially when I'm attending Price Waterhouse to check my financial portfolio.
I bet you get a lot of admiring glances :love-struck:
By: - 12th May 2016 at 11:50 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
...From other crossdressers?
I'll get my coat - a rather manly snorkel parka...
By: - 12th May 2016 at 12:05 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
I bet you get a lot of admiring glances :love-struck:
Yes Alan, Plus a few comments !
Posts: 2,748
By: snafu - 11th May 2016 at 15:20
I have seen nothing to indicate that she was told that she must wear heels to do her job and can only assume that the requirement was cosmetic rather than for any kind of health and safety aspect (steel toe-capped heels, anybody?). On BBC radio she said she was told that all staff must wear them, but when she pointed out a man working at reception without heels she was laughed at - demeaning to her and a somewhat sexist regulation.
Looks bad for PriceWaterhouse Cooper since they are in charge of the safety of employees in their buildings, and publicity about someone being sent away from their office for refusing to wear heels for a job involving standing and walking around a building for nine hours a day - which she said she could not do - will not be in their favour.