Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lock on: Modern Air Combat

Collapse
X
Collapse
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mixtec
    eye of Horus
    • Jan 2000
    • 1465

    #21
    You can pretty much ignore minimum requirements, these are system specs that are technically feasable, but in reality youll get a slideshow framerate. Recommended still means very low settings, and youll probably have to run at 800 x 600 to run well (800 x 600 is yucky!). Best configuration is what you REALLY need to be able to play the game at normal settings.

    Comment

    • F5M
      F5M
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2004
      • 151

      #22
      LoMAC: Buggy game that the patch 1,02 made it worse .And the game is heavy like and elephant but if you have a nuclear powered system and dont bother trying installing uninstalling the patches then you should get it . Its graphics rocks but to you have a proper idea is the Flanker 2.0 engine improved with a few more planes for you .

      Comment

      • GDL
        GDL
        Aussie Analyst
        • Apr 2004
        • 1378

        #23
        Originally posted by mixtec
        You can pretty much ignore minimum requirements, these are system specs that are technically feasable, but in reality youll get a slideshow framerate. Recommended still means very low settings, and youll probably have to run at 800 x 600 to run well (800 x 600 is yucky!). Best configuration is what you REALLY need to be able to play the game at normal settings.
        Agree, but it is interesting that the game's own developer would advertise these specs on their website, as that is where I got them from.
        ~ Glenn - Endgltige Vernichtung - !

        Visit the Aussie Fifth Column Forum for discussion and debate on life, politics, and weapons and warfare.

        Comment

        Unconfigured Ad Widget

        Collapse

         

        Working...
        X