Read the forum code of contact
By: 30th March 2002 at 13:10 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
Yeah i think theyhave more on order!! :)
By: 3rd April 2002 at 08:23 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
Do you know where they are coming from ?
By: 3rd April 2002 at 11:21 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
Is that the only DC-10 they are operating? If so, it looks like a cargo plane to me. Although it does look much better than those awful Russian Iluyshin and Tupolev things.
By: 3rd April 2002 at 15:06 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
yeah T5 - the F at the end of DC-10-40F indicated Freighter.
By: 3rd April 2002 at 15:18 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
>Although it does look much better
>than those awful Russian Iluyshin and Tupolev things.
Never knew them to be awful.
By: 3rd April 2002 at 17:24 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
Sorry, wasn't aware of the F being freighter.
On another subject. I am sick of being picked up and seeing others be picked up for sharing their opinions. If I do not like Iluyshin/Tupolev, I will say so if it is relevant to that particular topic. When I post a message, that is my opinion. After all, what's the point in having a forum if we are picked up for expressing opinions?!
Think about it...?!!
By: 3rd April 2002 at 17:37 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
Good on ya T5!!!
- MY opinion on T5's opinion!!! lol
By: 3rd April 2002 at 17:45 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
Thanks LGKR, good to see someone agrees with me! ;)
By: 3rd April 2002 at 22:05 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
>On another subject. I am sick of being picked up and seeing
>others be picked up for sharing their opinions. If I do not
>like Iluyshin/Tupolev, I will say so if it is relevant to
>that particular topic. When I post a message, that is my
>opinion. After all, what's the point in having a forum if we
>are picked up for expressing opinions?!
>
>Think about it...?!!
You think about what you just stated. All I said was that "I never knew Iluyshin and Tupelov to be awful." Which I think is a valid statement considering your choice of the word "awful," which is a negative remark that you have not backed up with any reason. Now, how was that picking on you? Did I even get personal with you? I have an opinion and I gave it. Was that enough to warrant a cry baby remark from you and follow it up with a neutral rating? You need to practice what you preach!
Sam.
By: 4th April 2002 at 09:01 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
Easy guys !!!!!
Everyone's opinion deserve respect .
By: 4th April 2002 at 12:37 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
That's the point I'm trying to put across - everyone's opinion deserves respect and not to be destroyed by other members of the forum.
What I don't like about the way Serendib approaches the situation is by copying and pasting sections of the post and tearing it to pieces. Yours is not an opinion but a straight-forward disagreement. It's not an opinion. Don't reply to a post when I've said something is awful by saying, "Never knew them to be awful". Simply say you'd have to disagree. You have opinions, I havepinions, we all have opinions and we are entitled to share them without being made to feel like idiots by other members.
By: 4th April 2002 at 12:47 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
Also, one more thing. I didn't back up my opinion. You never knew them to be awful. Why? You didn't tell us.
Your immmaturity certainly shows referring to my rating and remark as a crybaby remark. Looking at it from a different angle, I could have put it as a negative rating, but I didn't.
Practise what I preach? "I'd have to disagree with that also", that's MY OPINION. I did not use large segments of your postings and disect them, which is what you're doing to me.
And as for trying to make me seem like the culprit in this minor mess-up, you can think again. I started this because I felt it was impossible to put my views across without someone picking me up for my actions.
By: 4th April 2002 at 15:41 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
>That's the point I'm trying to put across - everyone's
>opinion deserves respect and not to be destroyed by other
>members of the forum.
Explain to me how I was destroying your opinion when all I said was "never knew them to be awful." How is that disrespectful?
>What I don't like about the way Serendib approaches the
>situation is by copying and pasting sections of the post and
>tearing it to pieces.
Copying and pasting and tearing it to pieces???????????
>Yours is not an opinion but a
>straight-forward disagreement. It's not an opinion. Don't
>reply to a post when I've said something is awful by saying,
>"Never knew them to be awful".
>Simply say you'd have to
>disagree.
I never knew that saying "never knew them to be awful" was not an opinion. So you would rather have me say "I disagree" than say "never knew them to be awful"???? Anyhow, even if I straight forwardly disagreed what is wrong with that?
>You have opinions, I havepinions, we all have
>opinions and we are entitled to share them without being
>made to feel like idiots by other members.
I know you have a opinion. It seems like you were offended by my opinion. How did I make you look like an idiot? Actually, you made yourself look like an idiot with your behavior.
Sam.
By: 4th April 2002 at 15:59 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
>Also, one more thing. I didn't back up my opinion. You never
>knew them to be awful. Why? You didn't tell us.
You statement does not make sense, you need to lay off whatever you are smoking.
>Your immmaturity certainly shows referring to my rating and
>remark as a crybaby remark. Looking at it from a different
>angle, I could have put it as a negative rating, but I
>didn't.
I think you are reffering to yourself. Yes, you are immature. You seem to have a hard time understanding what "opinion" is and YES you are a crybaby.
>Practise what I preach? "I'd have to disagree with that
>also", that's MY OPINION. I did not use large segments of
>your postings and disect them, which is what you're doing to
>me.
Sheeesh. Seems like you need to go to school and learn the language a bit more. Okay, I will explain it step by step. You gave your opinion, and I gave mine. Understood? Now, if I got personal with you or slandered you in anyway or I was disrespectful then you have a right to complain. Understood? If you go back and look at my post you will see that I did none of the above. Get it? You have a right to your opinion and I have a right to mine. You seem to have missed that. Yes, you need to practice what you preach, because when you accused me of not respecting your opinion (which was BS), you replied back saying "waaaaaaaah, eveyone's picking on me!!!" And thus, YOU ended up getting upset because I gave you my opinion.
>And as for trying to make me seem like the culprit in this
>minor mess-up, you can think again.
Yes, smoking dope does that to you. Where you think it is my fault when it is actually you who got into a temper tantrum and made a mockery of yourself.
>I started this because I
>felt it was impossible to put my views across without
>someone picking me up for my actions
You started this because you are maybe in the wrong forum. You should probably go to a forum for toddlers. Maybe people will start taking your views seriously when you start acting like an adult. Also I didn't know saying "never knew them to be awful" was picking on you. Waaaaaaaaahhhhh, mommmeeeeee, everyone's picking on me!!!
Sam.
By: 4th April 2002 at 16:15 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
No comment... look at what you've done (again) and what I've said.
By: 4th April 2002 at 16:57 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-RE: Good old workhorse
>No comment... look at what you've done (again) and what I've
>said.
It is called using the "reply with quote" option found in the software. It is probably out of your intelligence level, hence the reason you can't fathom it.
Sam.
Posts: 4,333
By: Hand87_5 - 29th March 2002 at 09:58
Did you know that Aeroflot started to operate DC10-40F ?
Good old thing !!!!
Attachments: