Read the forum code of contact
By: 13th June 2006 at 16:05 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Busyiest airport outside of london, aswell as the biggest, plus its open 24 hours.
By: 13th June 2006 at 16:08 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-biggest
great
is there stasticitics on it
none on the website
im lucky im not far
i meen busiest in world not uk ;)
By: 13th June 2006 at 16:28 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-biggest
great
is there stasticitics on it
none on the websiteim lucky im not far
i meen busiest in world not uk ;)
Can you re-phrase that please
By: 13th June 2006 at 16:36 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-dave@MAN,
The Code of Conduct says: "10) Please post in comprehensible English, commonly used abbreviations are acceptable however refrain from using ‘mobile’ text as not everyone understands it."
Here are three simple steps that will help everyone to avoid breaking rule 10:
Sentences will begin with a capital letter and will have a full stop at the end.
Postings will not be made in all upper-case characters.
Postings will not contain "Txt-speak"( "gr8", "m8", etc).
Flex
By: 13th June 2006 at 16:40 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Moderator Comment
You've already been warned about this, "Dave".
Please follow the same rules as everyone else if you want to continue posting in here.
Thanks
GA
By: 13th June 2006 at 16:44 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-sorry thats how i usually post
what does it rank in the world for:
biggest
busiest
is there stasticitics on it
i meen busiest in world not uk
By: 13th June 2006 at 16:53 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Moderator Comment
It's unacceptable for this forum.
Please follow the same rules as everyone else if you wish to continue posting in here. If you are unwilling to follow our rules, post elsewhere.
Any further unacceptable postings may be deleted without warning or explanation.
GA
By: 13th June 2006 at 18:48 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-I think by the post i think you mean, for example 10th busiesst in the world?
By: 13th June 2006 at 19:03 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-I think your google must be broken, two quick searches returned the following.
http://www.airports.org/cda/aci/display/main/aci_content.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-54-55-2812_9_2__
and
By: 13th June 2006 at 19:05 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-good thankyou
By: 13th June 2006 at 19:16 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Can only find top 30s, but MAN is not listed in them.
To give you a clue. For 2005 Long Beach (LGB) is listed as number 30 with 353'011 movements. Manchester has "only" 234'835 movements. By comparison, Atlanta was #1 with 980'386 movements.
In Europe Charles de Gaulle is largest with 522'619 movements (world ranking 11) followed by Frankfurt (490'147 #16), Heathrow (477'888 #17) and Amsterdam (420'633 #20).
http://www.airports.org/cda/aci/display/main/aci_content.jsp?zn=aci&cp=1-5-54-57_9_2__
[quote=dave@MAN[/quote]It must be high as it is a very busy airport[/quote]Respectfully, that argument is a bit pale. MAN only has two runways, one of which is closed half the day. So it does not take much to appear busy. A good number of airports in the world ranking have numerous runways. For instance, Atlanta and CDG have 4, Schiphol has 6, Atlanta has 7 (with more proposed) etc.
By: 13th June 2006 at 19:21 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-that doesent matter the main one allways consently has something going on
LGW ONE RUNWAY ONE OF THE BUSIEST [U]
By: 13th June 2006 at 19:33 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-MAN only has two runways, one of which is closed half the day. So it does not take much to appear busy.
For environmental reasons apparntly, Manchester is extermely "Environmently Friendly"
Just incase you didnt know,
Here is Passenger numbers, so this might give you an idea!
2004's (2005's dont think its been published)
44 - Honolulu (HNL) 21 971 556
45 - Dubai (DBX) 21 711 522
46 - Manchester (MAN) 21 544 199
47 - Shanghai/Pudong (PVG) 21 124 233
48 - Kuala Lumper (KUL) 21 058 572
in 2005 i think MAN handeled around 22,000,000 pax, but not sure!
Jon
By: 13th June 2006 at 19:37 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-thanks
By: 13th June 2006 at 19:44 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Seeing as we're on thr topic of MAN, does anyone have the passenger number for recent years? Would like to know how much of a rise there's been.
By: 13th June 2006 at 19:56 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Seeing as we're on thr topic of MAN, does anyone have the passenger number for recent years? Would like to know how much of a rise there's been.
In 2003
46 - Manchester (MAN) - 19 022 485
And you have 2004's so you can see a big rise there!
Jon
By: 13th June 2006 at 21:00 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-Some earlier passenger throughput and movements (rounded):
1965: 1.4 million, 47000 mvmts
1975: 2.7 million, 68400 mvmts
1980: 4.4 million, 83300 mvmts
1985: 6.2 million, 95600 mvmts
1991: 10.8 million, 151600 mvmts
1994: 14.8 million, 168000 mvmts
1997: 16.1 million, 168300 mvmts
MAN also handicapped by lack of full-length parallel taxiway to 24L/06R which means that when 24L is in use for landing, aircraft have to go in the loop and wait for a break in traffic for them to backtrack down the runway.
I would imagine typical movement rates in peak periods are between 55 and 60 per hour, slowing to around 30 in single runway ops.
By: 13th June 2006 at 22:07 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-For the past few years, I'm pretty sure that MAN has been in the 45-50 bracket of worldwide airports in terms of pax.
I would imagine typical movement rates in peak periods are between 55 and 60 per hour, slowing to around 30 in single runway ops.
R2 was designed to allow just slightly over 60 movements per hour, from memory.
By: 14th June 2006 at 15:42 Permalink - Edited 1st January 1970 at 01:00
-:D
Posts: 28
By: dave@MAN - 13th June 2006 at 15:58
fro aircraft movements in the world.It must be high as it is a very busy airport
thanks