Sleeping' US air traffic controller suspended

Read the forum code of contact

Member for

17 years 2 months

Posts: 102

An air traffic controller who was unavailable to help two jets land at a busy Washington DC airport has been suspended, an official has said.

Full story here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12850844

Rgds
Tim

Original post

Member for

24 years 3 months

Posts: 4,333

I just can't believe that only one controller was on duty!!!!
Greed....... as usual.

Member for

16 years 3 months

Posts: 270

I just can't believe that only one controller was on duty!!!!
Greed....... as usual.

As there have been more incidents, let me throw this in:

One of those things that isn't often discussed is that if the traffic is so low that one controller in the tower is sufficient, in reality it's so low that no controller is needed. However, the major airlines insist that there be a controller present when their planes come in, and the FAA generally does what they want. That's why you see towers open even if there are only three flights in six hours. A 2nd factor is it's more prestigious for a tower to be open 24 hours, so the locals push to have 24 hour towers at their airport. It's the FAA, though, not local authorities, that ultimately decides the hours of operation.

It's not just the late night shifts and the quick turnaround (note that one of the FAA's fixes is that instead of bringing a controller back after eight hours, they'll make the dramatic change of bringing one back after nine hours). It's also that the shifts rotate within the same workweek, the days off also rotate --and there can be a good deal of mandatory overtime. Now mix this with a situation where there is absolutely nothing happening for hours. It's night, there's no one else there and you're not allowed to listen to the radio or anything like that to help stay awake. This still does not excuse falling asleep, but it does help to identify causal factors.

The FAA is saying that one of their solutions is to have Management on during parts of those shifts, but don't forget that in at least one case the somnolent controller was a supervisor. Additionally, while they are saying they will have more people on that shift now, they're also saying they won't increase staffing. This probably means one thing-- more mandatory overtime.