Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 156

Thread: Azerbaijan Air Force

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    52
    Hmm... very strange but I have found this pic too. So congratulations you have right. Thx for your attention . I will delete my pic.

    Probably the other webiste is making disinformation on the internet.

    This Mig-25 is from Monino.

    http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia...t_mig25_01.jpg
    Last edited by GuneyAz; 28th July 2009 at 03:49.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    52
    Mi-24s


  3. #63
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35






    Last edited by AttilaA; 20th October 2011 at 00:42.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    Mi-24G Superhind Mk IV

    G stands for "Gecə", meaning "Night".





    Last edited by AttilaA; 20th October 2011 at 00:40.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by AttilaA View Post
    Mi-24G Superhind Mk IV

    G stands for "Gecə", meaning "Night".
    Is continuing purchasing Russian equipment for Azeriland a good thing?

    Russia and Azeriland have quite cordial relations, but is very clear that they favor Armenia and has bases there. If Armenia and Azeriland go to war again, will Russia still be willing to give supplies and parts to the Azeris?

    Turkey on the other hand may be more willing to help Azeris, perhaps donating F-16s and F-4s..

    if AzeriAF had F-4s.. the F-4 and MiG-29 combo would make the AzAF the smokiest air force in the planet :diablo:

    but who knows.. Turkey under Erdogan Helicopters does things oppositely.. they're willing to work militarily with Serbia, and go against Israel their ally. Maybe Erdogan may go against Azeriland too..

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,811
    Russia and Azerbaijan have good relationship, hell they even sold them Favorit recently. IF anything Russian relations with both nations just decrease the likelihood of conflict in the area, though I am not sure as to actual Azeri intentions in regards to Armenia.

    What is curios is they ordered both Mi-35M and this hideous South African upgrade....needless fleet splitting IMO. Does the front seater have ANY visibility with that installation ?
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    277
    No JF-17 Thunders just yet then? What ever happened to this order? Thought it was a done deal

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    I don't think there were such an order.
    Last edited by AttilaA; 20th October 2011 at 21:08.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    Not air force, but should add this.












  11. #71
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by DrPepper View Post
    No JF-17 Thunders just yet then? What ever happened to this order? Thought it was a done deal
    yeah, you had all these media sites making claims that the JF-17 was being ordered by all these countries, Azerbaijan, Zimbabwe, etc.. none of them real. of course don't tell that to certain fanboys who believe its being bought by the entire third world.

    China is generally pretty good on deliveries, if they ordered it back two or three years ago when we first heard the story, it would've been delivered already.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by TR1 View Post
    . IF anything Russian relations with both nations just decrease the likelihood of conflict in the area, though I am not sure as to actual Azeri intentions in regards to Armenia.
    I think you do not realize that is the problem. last war, Azeriland lost land to Armenia (whether who owns it historically is a diff question). next potential war, Azeriland wants to take it back but now the problem is there's Russian bases there.



    What is curios is they ordered both Mi-35M and this hideous South African upgrade....needless fleet splitting IMO. Does the front seater have ANY visibility with that installation ?
    south african upgrade is a good upgrade,
    here's the front view

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    AFAIK that is Mk 3, not Mk IV.

    Mk IV cockpit has MFDs, while this is supposedly the Mk3 cockpit. http://media.photobucket.com/image/S...iscl/Hind2.jpg
    Last edited by AttilaA; 20th October 2011 at 21:10.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    TR1, how many night capable attack helis Russian is planning?

    I don't think other CIS countries (of course, excluding Russia) come even close to Azerbaijan in night attack heli capabilities.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by AttilaA View Post
    TR1, how many night capable attack helis Russian is planning?

    I don't think other CIS countries (of course, excluding Russia) come even close to Azerbaijan in night attack heli capabilities.
    They have this one?



    they called it Kavkaz hunter

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,811
    Apparently a lot, the current breakdown as we know it is:
    97 Mi-28N through 2015, more after. Total number around 200 was floated.
    Ka-52 has current contract for 30 airframes through 2012, but recently it was voiced that total numbers maybe around 120. Also, Naval Ka-52 is going to be procured.
    Finally there is a current order for 22 Mi-35M.
    There is also the small batch of Mi-24PN, but that program seems to be dead.

    In other former Soviet countries, Azerbaijan seems to be pretty much the clear winner. They ordered what, 24 Mi-35Ms, and how many Super Hinds do they have? Aside from Russia and Azerbaijan the CIS countries rely completely on legacy Mi-24.
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  17. #77
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by TR1 View Post
    Apparently a lot, the current breakdown as we know it is:
    97 Mi-28N through 2015, more after. Total number around 200 was floated.
    Ka-52 has current contract for 30 airframes through 2012, but recently it was voiced that total numbers maybe around 120. Also, Naval Ka-52 is going to be procured.
    Finally there is a current order for 22 Mi-35M.
    There is also the small batch of Mi-24PN, but that program seems to be dead.

    In other former Soviet countries, Azerbaijan seems to be pretty much the clear winner. They ordered what, 24 Mi-35Ms, and how many Super Hinds do they have? Aside from Russia and Azerbaijan the CIS countries rely completely on legacy Mi-24.
    I still do not understand why they are going ahead with both Mi-28 and Ka-52, they may have some slight advantage and disadvantage in some areas, but its not good enough reason to justify two attack helicopters unless Russia was trying to subsidize both companies to keep them busy. Just like how the US doesn't really need both AH-1Z and AH-64

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    Thank you for the answer.
    Last edited by AttilaA; 20th October 2011 at 22:34.

  19. #79
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by J-20 Hotdog View Post
    I still do not understand why they are going ahead with both Mi-28 and Ka-52, they may have some slight advantage and disadvantage in some areas, but its not good enough reason to justify two attack helicopters unless Russia was trying to subsidize both companies to keep them busy. Just like how the US doesn't really need both AH-1Z and AH-64
    1.) They are both cool, don't complain.
    2.) Factory production capability per year. Easier to produce both than set up another line for either chopper.
    3.) Factory employment and future stability
    4.) I suspected they would order a number of both and see which does better in service, I guess so much for that.
    5.) I don't think the Zulu Cobra comparison is really analogous here, because the Cobra/Apache split has to do with different service branch requirements, deployment specifics, and funding.
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  20. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    277
    Quote Originally Posted by J-20 Hotdog View Post
    I still do not understand why they are going ahead with both Mi-28 and Ka-52, they may have some slight advantage and disadvantage in some areas, but its not good enough reason to justify two attack helicopters unless Russia was trying to subsidize both companies to keep them busy. Just like how the US doesn't really need both AH-1Z and AH-64
    You make it sound like this is a bad thing, I wish more countries would support htere industries by taking such action. I say fair play to them if that is the reason!

  21. #81
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by TR1 View Post
    1.) They are both cool, don't complain.
    2.) Factory production capability per year. Easier to produce both than set up another line for either chopper.
    3.) Factory employment and future stability
    4.) I suspected they would order a number of both and see which does better in service, I guess so much for that.
    5.) I don't think the Zulu Cobra comparison is really analogous here, because the Cobra/Apache split has to do with different service branch requirements, deployment specifics, and funding.
    and out of all those, only #3 sounds plausible..
    but yes they are quite cool, and it'd be easier to love one than two :diablo:
    but I might just have to side with the Kamov simply because I think contra rotating rotors should be the way to go for most things. All of the concepts for that new US Joint Helicopter, all use contra rotating rotors.

    something worth mentioning.. why are both the HOkum and Havok so damn heavy.. they are both signifciantly heavier than the next two western heavies, the Apache Longbow and Rooivalk

  22. #82
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    4,811
    They are bigger, have a bigger payload, and let's not even talk about armor levels.

    Just look at the engine power, it is not higher randomly.
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  23. #83
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by AttilaA View Post
    Mi-24G Superhind Mk IV

    G stands for "Gecə", meaning "Night".

  24. #84
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    ALBANIA
    Posts
    321
    Quote Originally Posted by AttilaA View Post
    Never seen hind in a modification like this one.how is calles this variant?

  25. #85
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    ALBANIA
    Posts
    321
    Quote Originally Posted by TR1 View Post
    They are bigger, have a bigger payload, and let's not even talk about armor levels.

    Just look at the engine power, it is not higher randomly.
    yeh,mi-28 and ka-52 carry twice the armament campared to ah-64.their armor protection is awsome.the can withstand 20 mm guns and their windshield can withstand 12,7 mm gun

  26. #86
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,353
    Quote Originally Posted by AttilaA View Post
    http://i55.tinypic.com/2lus9rs.jpg
    Damn that thing looks wicked!!
    Thanks

  27. #87
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35
    First Mi-35Ms.

    Last edited by AttilaA; 4th December 2011 at 22:24.

  28. #88
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    35

  29. #89
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    894
    Quote Originally Posted by J

    something worth mentioning.. why are both the HOkum and Havok so damn heavy.. they are both signifciantly heavier than [I
    the next two western heavies, the Apache Longbow and Rooivalk[/I]
    Completely OT, but isn't Rooivalk pretty mouch dead? Small domestic order and no sucess on the export market. And who would want to gamble with a SA helo considering the state the country is in and heading?

  30. #90
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Cataclysm
    Posts
    2,929
    Before the delivery, the Azeri MiG-29s were upgraded to basic standard MiG-29MU1. That includes N019M1 radar updated by Phazotron Ukraine but without the Belrussian MFD installed in the cockpit.

    Last edited by MSphere; 11th December 2011 at 23:25.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES