I though the cold war was, like, you know, OVER!?
I know Russia wants to regain it's tough-kid-on-the-block image, but this is cutting it a little too close, dontcha think?
|
|
|
There are some - officially denied - rumors here in Russia about plans to put Tu-160 and Tu-95 onto Cuba. As a response to the Czech/Polish NMD components.
Wouldn't make terribly much sense. Tu-22M3 would be the better choice, I think.
But it's an interesting scenario, because the U.S. air defense all along the south-eastern seaboard and the Gulf coast would have to be strengthened. The Eglin Raptors with a real mission?
In any case it would be a major escalation, putting nuclear capable assets into the Americas.
Opinions?
"Distiller ... arrogant, ruthless, and by all reports (including his own) utterly charming"
I though the cold war was, like, you know, OVER!?
I know Russia wants to regain it's tough-kid-on-the-block image, but this is cutting it a little too close, dontcha think?
Good for them. If USA wants to play tough, then they must accept the consequences.
Yes yes but cue on the fanboys talking about how one F-22 can take out 57 regiments of Backfires and their cousins. . . or what not. . .
They might as well put up a Gorgon/Gazelle ABM site up on Cuba, and a few Topol-M launchers . . .
Here is a Russian newspaper Izvestia said on Monday , a new coldwar ?
Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba
Move Would Be Response to U.S. Missile Defense System, Newspaper Izvestia Says
MOSCOW, July 21 -- Russian bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons could be deployed to Cuba in response to U.S. plans to install a missile defense system in Eastern Europe, a Russian newspaper reported Monday, citing an unnamed senior Russian air force official.
The report in Izvestia, which could not be confirmed, prompted memories of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, when the United States and the Soviet Union came to the brink of nuclear war after Nikita Khrushchev put nuclear missiles on the Caribbean island. The weapons were eventually withdrawn in an apparent Soviet climb-down, but President John F. Kennedy also secretly agreed to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey.
A spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry declined to comment on the report Monday, but did not deny it. Izvestia is often a forum for strategic leaks by Kremlin and other officials.
"While they are deploying the missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic, our strategic bombers will already be landing in Cuba," Izvestia quoted the source as saying.
It was unclear if the source was suggesting that Russia would reopen a base in Cuba or merely use an airfield there for stopovers by the bombers, Tu-160s and Tu-95s, which are already capable of reaching the United States from bases in Russia.
Russian strategic bombers, long mothballed, resumed worldwide patrols last year under orders from then-President Vladimir Putin. The flights have continued under his successor, Dmitry Medvedev.
Aircraft from the NATO alliance have repeatedly scrambled as the bombers approached but did not enter the airspace of alliance countries. The Russian bombers also buzzed low over the USS Nimitz, an American aircraft carrier, in the Pacific Ocean this year.
Some Russian experts dismissed the possibility of a new Cuban crisis. "It's very silly psychological warfare," said Alexander Golts, an independent military analyst, in a telephone interview. "Putin and Medvedev are very militant in words but very cautious in practical issues. They have not taken any step that can be seen as a real threat to the West, and I cannot see any reason to raise this threat against the U.S."
But "if it's true, it looks like a repetition of the Caribbean crisis" he said, using the common Russian term for the Cuban missile crisis.
Cuba was a client state of Moscow's for decades during the Soviet era. However, those ties have largely ended since the early 1990s. Russia closed its last base on the island, a radar facility, in 2002, and it is unclear whether the Cuban government would grant landing rights to Russian bombers.
The United States says it wants to deploy tracking radar in the Czech Republic and 10 missile interceptors in Poland as a defensive measure against missiles that might be fired from countries such as Iran. U.S. officials insist that the system presents no threat to Russia, which, they say, could easily overwhelm it by launching multiple missiles at the same time.
But Russia views it as a means to peer into Russian airspace. Officials here argue it could be easily expanded to undermine their country's strategic defenses and that Iran is many years away from developing missiles that could reach the United States or its allies in Western Europe.
Putin has in the past invoked the Cuban missile crisis to register opposition to the missile defense project, saying it could touch off brinksmanship as dangerous as in 1962.
Putin also said last year that Russia could target the sites in Poland and the Czech Republic with missiles and deploy missiles in Kaliningrad, the Russian enclave that borders Poland, if the United States pushes ahead with its plans.
Medvedev has also registered opposition. And this month, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement that "we will be forced to react not with diplomatic but with military-technical methods."
The United States has reached agreement with the Czech Republic, but negotiations with Poland have proved difficult, continuing in Warsaw on Monday. The Polish government wants the United States to upgrade its air defenses in return for the use of its soil for the missile defense system.
"The two sides have said they are drawing closer," said Piotr Paszkowski, a spokesman for the Polish Foreign Ministry, after Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski held talks with U.S. Assistant Undersecretary of State Dan Fried on Monday.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...072102478.html
I seriously doubt that the Medvedev Governement would be short sighted enough to place nuclear assets on Cuba. Even if they managed to get clearance from the Cubans to open another base there (which they likely couldnt), and managed to get the bombers and requisite supplies to cuba without the US or anyone else noticing (unlikely considering the diparity in the opposing atlantic navies), and managed to initiate a successful combat mission, there is still no way the Sov.. i mean Russians could sustain combat operations in a base seperated by a few thousand miles of NATO controlled ocean. So all this really is a bit of psycological warfare aimed at putting increased pressure on NATO, and in fact the US to quit it's advance further east, which by the way it promised not to do at the end of the Cold War.
These are nuclear bombers, they only get to do a single mission in case of a global war. Most probably one-way (one way ticket, one way ticket...). No one talks about a second or third mission against the US.
As I look at the map, wouldn't it be more efficient to get a regiment of Su-27's and one of Su-34/24 out there?
It's not worth doing something unless you were doing something that someone, somewere, would much rather you weren't doing.
The link below is to a Reuters article from back in 1999 about flying Tu-160s to Cuba.
Vladimir Putin also was (brand new) Prime Minister back then. Déjà vu ...
http://www.cubanet.org/CNews/y99/nov99/12e4.htm
"Distiller ... arrogant, ruthless, and by all reports (including his own) utterly charming"
You know, if you listen carefully, I think that you could still hear them partying in the Pentagon at this news.
Lets face it any airfield in Cuba operating nuclear capable Russian bombers is going to be saturation TLAM'd and CALCM'd to death very early in any strategic escalation so the actual threat presented by a couple of squadrons of Russian bombers exposed on Cuba is minimal. The shock value of letting the populace know that winged death is sat just across the water waiting to be unleashed is going to authorise many, many more Raptors!.
You sure this is a genuine Russian news piece?
Last edited by Jonesy; 22nd July 2008 at 11:17.
"....and for everyone else....the trick is to bang the flint rocks together guys!!!"
officially denied
in Distiller's 1st post...
Important Hyper Note: I am NOT an Aeronautical Engineer NOR an Aerospace Expert, etc, etc nor do I claim to be one.
Regards,
Hyper McStupid
Depends on how mant TLAMS you fire ...
And, if the rissians wanteded to get cute, they'd just need to base some good, long ranged sams there. Now that would be a threat.
Regards,
Frank
This is more than a little unwise - all Russia is doing is making it's neighbours more and more worried about its intentions. The fact that NATO has expanded Eastwards is due to the fact that those nations actually chose to join NATO. Why on Earth should countries like Poland, Czech Rep, Romania (etc...) be stopped from joining NATO, just because Russia doesn't want them to. Nobody with even the slightest degree of sanity honestly believes that NATO wants to attack Russia, or represents any real threat to Russia militarily.
The more Russia tries to escalate things, the worse things will get - the US will have more reason to improve its ABM and air defences. Heck, the USAF would absolutely love for a squadron of Tupolevs to be based in Cuba; it would be a great reason for them to get a few hundred more Raptors, and more JSFs, and even a renewed AWACS fleet! All in all, the idea of putting Tupolevs on Cuba to scare the US is just about the worst idea possible.
Are we sure that this isn't just a USAF planted story? :diablo:
The USAF isn't going to get anything while their fleet of F-15s and F-16s is still around. . .
I guess those guys have a consulting contract with LM![]()
It's not like BACKFIREs aren't large radar targets or anything...Originally Posted by dionis
Both of those are absurdly stupid ideas. No ICBM is going to be anywhere near close enough to Cuba to be shot down by a GAZELLE site (GORGON is no longer operational). Topol-M? To do what, fire at Hawaii? Topol-M TELs are large, identifiable vehicles that won't be that hard to locate. A better idea would be low-altitude, high-speed cruise missiles (Meteorit derivative, maybe), or an IRBM. Smaller package, more survivable, harder to locate.Originally Posted by dionis
If they really did want to make a statement they'd just put two S-400 batteries in Cuba, one at each end of the island. The portion of the airspace they'd effectively be able to close down would be huge.Originally Posted by dionis
Except for the F-22s being currently procured...and the F-35...and a new bomber around 2018...and more C-17s...Originally Posted by dionis
I wont be surprizedd that a bomber base with S-400/MIG-31 protection with under ground bases is opened some where in latin America. they have just huge amount of money and interests. with alot of food to sell to third world in coming years.
And thise will go to North Africa, Vietnam and with new deals with House of Saud. i expect even Saudi arabia proteciton from its own people and outside. But when all these bases are open i dont expect natural resources price to go down.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080722/.../russia_chavez
Chavez says Venezuela needs Russia for protection
Lukoil is already helping Venezuela quantify heavy crude oil deposits in its Orinoco River basin — one of the world's largest petroleum deposits. Russia's Gazprom has two natural gas exploration and production licenses in Venezuela.
Yeah, and 10 Bombers means a hundred more F-22s. Are you thinking about this?
Considering the SS-20 is out of service, the SS-27 makes the most sense. . . Since it's designed to avoid ABM defenses. . . which is kind of what this whole debacle is about . . .
Unless they want to shoot Florida with the Iskander . . . if it even reaches those last few kilometers. . . You are taking this stupid thread too seriously :P
Last edited by dionis; 22nd July 2008 at 13:34.
Where did I say they were getting any more than those already planned?Originally Posted by dionis
That is a conspiracy by neocons that want to have more F-22's ordered.
Any other explanation wouldn't make sense at all.
To form a real threat to the USA the Russians have to come up with more than terribly outdated Tu-22M and the few Tu-160. The Cuban airspace is a door wide open for the USAF anyways. They can go there any time and anywhere without having to fear too much trouble.
Publicly, we say one thing... Actually, we do another.
In hope for an educated discussion about Russian military hardwares and the complete unemotional assessment of their capabilities in face of newest American defense assets, I placed a "star49" tag to this thread. Let's see if the thread justifies it.![]()
Publicly, we say one thing... Actually, we do another.
If you followed developments in the politics, procurement and strategy of Russian military affairs (which you clearly do not) you would be well aware that there have been several threats to withdraw from the INF treaty and accompanying statements about howeasy it would be for Russia to make new IRBM's and GLCM's all of which would be far more appropriate for deployment to Cuba. While I would be amazed if the idea has not been muted in Russian Government and defence circles I would be equally amazed if they were dumb enough to try it. Look what happened last time and the issue is now such an ego fuelling historical precident that there is almost no way that a US president could back down and let it happen. If the Russians really want to be annoying they should just plant some conventional forces in Venezuela or Cuba, a few SAM systems or fighters (we are defending are allie blah blah) but I would be surprised if even that happens. Cuba is potentially to fragile and why let Chavez have stuff for free when he has the oil dollars and ego to pay for it?
Is the Tu-22M3 required to turn into a flying saucer to impress here?
Because to me, a supersonic bomber that can fly very fast or very low, armed with 500KM range nuclear weapons is pretty damn deadly, especially if it can remain on station for a long time till it's replaced by another, etc.
If you have the production and design capacity for both there is not much in it and a unilateral withdrawal from the INF would hardly be challenging and could take effect instantaneously. Furthermore both the Bulava and RS-24 programs show that Russia is not affraid to embark upon fresh development. I am sure that a ground launched Kh-101/102/555 would not be a difficult exercise for Russian industry.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)