Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: F-84F thunderstreak

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    365

    F-84F thunderstreak

    Was it an under rated aircraft ?overshadowed quickly by better designs

    It served in huge numbers in NATO airforces esp of germany turkey and Greece

    it carried a good offensive load and had average performance of its age , much better suited in the ground attack role ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NI, UK
    Posts
    490
    Some quirks of the design were discussed previously, but there is a lot that mystifies me about the choice of the F-84F for NATO.

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showt...-Thunderstreak

    It was said to be a sluggish aircraft with unfriendly handling, which killed many pilots. In contrast the NA FJ4 Fury was praised for its handling, as well as being much longer-ranged ( 3000+ litres internal fuel versus 2100 ) on the same engine and equally competent in air-to-ground versus air-to-air.

    Even the F-86H would seem to have been a better all-round multi-role choice than the F-84F for smaller nations.

    So why was was F-84F selected for provision to NATO? Reminds me somewhat of the P-47 being selected for MDAP after WW2 whilst the P-51 was primarily retained for USAF use.
    Last edited by Cherry Ripe; 4th July 2017 at 07:00.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES