Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Page 121 of 121 FirstFirst ... 2171111117118119120121
Results 3,601 to 3,626 of 3626

Thread: RuAF News and development Thread part 15

  1. #3601
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    53
    Thank goodness, upgrade plan for Ka-52s.

    They seriously ******* need new sights(current ones are just old), some of the guncam footage shown before looked awful in the nightime shots.

    http://militarynews.ru/story.asp?rid=1&nid=454336

    Now we have created a modernization plan of priorities - it can be fast enough to make that medium, that for the long term We have a mandate from the Minister of Defense about this, we're working on it." - A.Boginsky said.
    He said that first of all modernization undergo opto-electronic station, that is, sighting systems.
    "Plus one of the problems - the unification of armaments for the brand and the brand Mi Ka" - A.Boginsky said.
    According to him, soon will meet with representatives of the FSI and naval aviation to discuss the next plan.
    Last edited by Sab3r329; 22nd June 2017 at 00:18.

  2. #3602
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    9,057
    GOES-451 footage looked pretty solid overall IMO, much better than Mi-28 and enabled accurate 8km ranged shots at night and day.

    The night footage did look grainy but who knows how much of that is compression from the video transfer.

    I found it very weird that Borisov mentioned "primarily range" as the cause for improvement desire, as the GOES-451 has shown no problems with that at all.

    However unifying Ka-52 and Mi-28 sights would be great indeed, though I wonder how that is possible....Mi-28NM is already flying and we know whats its optics package looks like. Hopefully this refers to pilots FLIR turret.
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  3. #3603
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    53
    Well, IMHO I think GOES-451 is just rather old by now, and it shows. Please don't take this as an attack on the Ka-52, I am rather a fan of the aircraft, it has many impressive features to its name.

    The night time imaging looks very poor simply because the camera is simply out of date, and I do not think compression has anything to do with it as all the daytime imagery looks just fine, and the GUI looks fine across both instances(a reliable indicator), so unless Ka-52's computers do something funny in terms of how it handles the recording of video and numeral data onto its data banks, the sensor itself is just out of date.

    Daytime looks somewhat acceptable, though I do believe it needs to be full color as electro-optic systems now come with such modes.

    I think raw viewing range isn't the problem, but the quality and resolution is, which would affect how well you could shoot at such distances, target identification and all that.

    And yeah, adding an independent optical system for the pilot would be wonderful, especially if the start putting those HMDs that have seen into service and onto the pilot and gunner of both Ka-52 and Mi-28NM.

  4. #3604
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    5,727
    Not Military but portfolio of UAC Civil Aircraft Program

    "A map does you no good if you don't know where you are"

  5. #3605
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,129
    Supposedly, MiG-35 for RuAF will have AESA and be powered by RD-33MK (not MKM?) with TVC;

    http://iz.ru/609094/dmitrii-litovkin...net-v-vozdukhe

  6. #3606
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    5,790
    Which type of TVC would that be?
    Thanks

  7. #3607
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,327
    Tu-160M2 more advanced than B2. Tu-160M2 starting soon.

    https://sputniknews.com/military/201...ects-analysis/

  8. #3608
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,327
    it already say 12% more power. but practically MIG-35 is much more powerfull plane than any of its competitors. it can short takeoff with 5.5 ton load from Carrier despite much larger airframe than Rafale with higher top speed and altitude.

    http://www.defensenews.com/articles/...g-35-this-year

  9. #3609
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,412
    Supposedly, MiG-35 for RuAF will have AESA and be powered by RD-33MK (not MKM?) with TVC;

    http://iz.ru/609094/dmitrii-litovkin...net-v-vozdukhe
    I dont read Russian, but doesnt that contradicts this:

    Although it was previously offered to India with Phazotron-NIIR Zhuk-A AESA radar, the Russian military preferred the less-advanced Zhuk variant with slotted array. It can track up to 30 airborne targets at a range of 99 mi. (160 km)
    http://aviationweek.com/defense/mig-...mig-35-fighter

    Cheers

  10. #3610
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by Sab3r329 View Post
    Well, IMHO I think GOES-451 is just rather old by now, and it shows. Please don't take this as an attack on the Ka-52, I am rather a fan of the aircraft, it has many impressive features to its name.

    The night time imaging looks very poor simply because the camera is simply out of date, and I do not think compression has anything to do with it as all the daytime imagery looks just fine, and the GUI looks fine across both instances(a reliable indicator), so unless Ka-52's computers do something funny in terms of how it handles the recording of video and numeral data onto its data banks, the sensor itself is just out of date.

    Daytime looks somewhat acceptable, though I do believe it needs to be full color as electro-optic systems now come with such modes.

    I think raw viewing range isn't the problem, but the quality and resolution is, which would affect how well you could shoot at such distances, target identification and all that.

    And yeah, adding an independent optical system for the pilot would be wonderful, especially if the start putting those HMDs that have seen into service and onto the pilot and gunner of both Ka-52 and Mi-28NM.
    what other optical system does Russia have they can utilize? Or you think this will be a new build?

  11. #3611
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    near nowhere
    Posts
    2,131
    what other optical system does Russia have they can utilize? Or you think this will be a new build?
    Maybe the same OES-52 than on Egyptian Ka-52 or Ka-52K...

    Last edited by archangelski; 22nd June 2017 at 16:35.

  12. #3612
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    169
    Quick reply! Thank you. After a quick read up, this system was first introduced in 2016. Is this correct? If so, then most likely will end up replacing the older GOES-451 and the system on Mi-28. It only makes sense to use common components between the two helicopters.

  13. #3613
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    9,057
    That OES is full of French components, it is a joint venture, so forget it for domestic birds.

    I dont read Russian, but doesnt that contradicts this:
    Not necessarily. RuMOD has always been waiting for the AESA to be ready, it has just taken so long that the first several MiG-35 pre-serials flew with Zhuk-M2. Previously it was mentioned by AF officials that the first batch would be bought with the Zhuk-M as a stop gap, but then again this is Izvestiya, which has been wrong before.
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  14. #3614
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    53
    what other optical system does Russia have they can utilize? Or you think this will be a new build?
    Well, I doubt they'd use the Sagem optics that were spotted on the Egypt Ka-52 since those are foreign.

    I'd bet that they might use the Mi-28NM optics for commonality, and they both use the same weaponry so I would doubt that it would be a major problem.

    What would be REALLY nice if the Ka-52 pilot gets his own electro-optic system like on the current Mi-28N/Ms, and the early pre-serial? Ka-52s.

  15. #3615
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    169
    Cool! Can't wait to see the upgrades

  16. #3616
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    22
    @ WP840:

    What is the frame over the front pilot's head inside the cockpit?
    That is a rail for curtains that will prevent the pilot from seeing outside. It basicaly forces the pilot who is in training, to learn how to fly the airplane using the instruments only.

  17. #3617
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,412
    Not necessarily. RuMOD has always been waiting for the AESA to be ready, it has just taken so long that the first several MiG-35 pre-serials flew with Zhuk-M2. Previously it was mentioned by AF officials that the first batch would be bought with the Zhuk-M as a stop gap, but then again this is Izvestiya, which has been wrong before.
    Thanks, thats sensible and entirely possible.

  18. #3618
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    4,327
    this incorrect. MIG busy with MIG29K/MIG29SMT/MIG29UPG/MIG29M2/MIG31BM projects with drones and prospective fighter and these are more aircraft than Dassualt or Saab Gripen/EF team handle at same time. MIG-35 just this year presented and will end test.
    In one year of signing of contract MIG35 deliver.
    http://www.migavia.ru/index.php/ru/n...omu-pokoleniyu

    Now the process is almost complete: we are at the final stage in the restructuring of the production. In 2016, we included the corporation Nizhny Novgorod Aircraft building plant "Sokol", and in January 2017 he became a full work within company culture MiG: where do the restructuring of the mechanical equipment, reduce production time cycles in the final assembly shop, conduct testing of aircraft. It is implementing a number of large projects on modernization of our flight test facility in Lukhovitsy. We have introduced, perhaps, the best production of the composite, which is in the aviation industry, has launched a new galvanic production. On Kalyazin update machinery factory machinery equipment. For all these reasons, I believe that the planned financial results will be achieved in the next three years.

    How long is the production cycle for a single machine?

    - Since the signing of the contract - a little more than a year. This, together with working and passing flight tests

  19. #3619
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    9,057
    The latest in the interception back and forth:





    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  20. #3620
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    9,057
    Open day @ Pushkin- apparently the Su-35 brought R-77s along with KAB-500Krs. Some good detailed photos:

    http://bastion-karpenko.ru/r-77-pushkin-170604/

    http://bastion-karpenko.ru/su-35s-pushkin-170604/

    And some close ups of the R-33 mounts on the MiG-31:

    http://bastion-karpenko.ru/r-33-pushkin-170604/
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  21. #3621
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,461
    @ Sintra

    I dont read Russian, but doesnt that contradicts this:

    Although it was previously offered to India with Phazotron-NIIR Zhuk-A AESA radar, the Russian military preferred the less-advanced Zhuk variant with slotted array. It can track up to 30 airborne targets at a range of 99 mi. (160 km)
    http://aviationweek.com/defense/mig-...mig-35-fighter


    Cheers
    Install Yandex browser and enable automatic translation.

  22. #3622
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,461
    @haavarla
    Full 3D , it seems.

    The presence of all-aspect nozzle radically distinguishes the engine of the MiG-35 from engines with variable thrust vectoring AL-31FP is installed on the heavy su-30SM. Older brothers it is a single design. While the "MiG" is two separate units.

  23. #3623
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    9,057
    Photos from the "presentation" a while back:



    Note the warning regarding composites on the engine nacelle:















    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  24. #3624
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    9,057
    The heavy Kh-31 loud-out from that vid last year:

    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

  25. #3625
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    169
    So what's the news on AAM's like R-37 and R-77-1? Been quiet. Same goes for S-500 and 350 development. Wondering if anyone here has up to date info willing to share?

    Awesome pictures of the MiG-35 BTW. Looking nice.
    Last edited by sepheronx; 25th June 2017 at 19:52.

  26. #3626
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    9,057
    R-77-1 is in service. Has been popping up on Su-35s in Russia here and there.

    R-37 has not been bought yet.
    http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/9098/rsz11rsz3807.jpg

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES