Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Page 56 of 56 FirstFirst ... 6465253545556
Results 1,651 to 1,671 of 1671

Thread: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015

  1. #1651
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,959
    Quote Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
    Wyy not carry the Storm inside the stealthy FCAS bays and use the Typhoon as an escort?
    I don't know for FCAS, but afaik biggest armament launched by nEUROn as 250 kg bomb.

  2. #1652
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,236
    The FCAS is supposed to do most of its job on it's own except for the decision on the kill (or at least that is what we will be told during any development process).

  3. #1653
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,144
    Quote Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
    Wyy not carry the Storm inside the stealthy FCAS bays and use the Typhoon as an escort?
    I guess you mean as interceptor ? Because escorting a vlo striker with a non-vlo escort makes no sense at all.

  4. #1654
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    98

    Typhoon pilot interview

    The group may enjoy our interview with RAF Typhoon pilot, Roger Cruickshank.

  5. #1655
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    "Where the fruit is"
    Posts
    4,218
    Quote Originally Posted by Aurel View Post
    I guess you mean as interceptor ? Because escorting a vlo striker with a non-vlo escort makes no sense at all.
    By Escort, I did not mean close range escort, but off-range

  6. #1656
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,834
    How about Neuron fly in line abreast formation with Meteor deployable from positions unknown to the enemy. So Storm Shadow still deployed from Typhoon. Saves weight on Typhoon. Make an enemy think twice about being airborne when Typhoon is detected in the proximity
    Go Huskers!

  7. #1657
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,144
    I still fail to imagine a scenario where both Typhoon and a vlo theatre bomber would complement each other. It's either lightly defended airspace (some fixed SAM installations, some legacy fighters) then Typhoon will handle it with ease. (no need for a fancy stealth bomber with bomb bays large enough to carry alcm's internally)
    Or it's heavily defended airspace with mobile double digit SAMs and a notable number of modern fighters then Typhoon won't operate in said airspace until air defenses are decimated.

  8. #1658
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    4,834
    It takes a lot of mobile SAM to counter even one stealth striker. The advantage goes to the more prepared. It's much more efficient and effective to update highly mobile platforms with better technology. Numerical edges are not always enough.
    Go Huskers!

  9. #1659
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Sarum
    Posts
    4,236
    The FCAS model draws from the detailed work BAE and Dassault have done over decades to prove whether a VLO UCAV will be able to operate at will in your SAM laden environment. It's not there for a holiday, it's there to pick off the missiles so other less discrete airframes can progress.

    Increasingly, whether we are looking at the British, Spanish or Germans (I haven't read about the Italian plans), Typhoon's future is tied to a UCAV.

  10. #1660
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Aurel View Post
    I still fail to imagine a scenario where both Typhoon and a vlo theatre bomber would complement each other. It's either lightly defended airspace (some fixed SAM installations, some legacy fighters) then Typhoon will handle it with ease. (no need for a fancy stealth bomber with bomb bays large enough to carry alcm's internally)
    Or it's heavily defended airspace with mobile double digit SAMs and a notable number of modern fighters then Typhoon won't operate in said airspace until air defenses are decimated.
    The VLO platforms would open a corridor for the non VLO.

  11. #1661
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,144
    Quote Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
    Wyy not carry the Storm inside the stealthy FCAS bays and use the Typhoon as an escort?
    That was my starting point. If you have a VLO platform able to deliver storm shadow there is no point of Typhoon involvement. If the FCAS is smaller (as I would expect) then yes, doing old fashioned SEAD/DEAD missions to open a corridor are back on the menu. But this kinda defeats the purpose of having a stealth platform.
    The whole cost/benefit equation for developing, fielding and maintaining VLO assets was the promise to just avoid enemy air defenses instead of the time and money consuming process of suppression and destruction of enemy air defenses.

  12. #1662
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    951
    I've got a question concerning German Eurofighters.

    Have any of them (if so, how many?) finally been integrated with and cleared to use guided air to ground weapons? For some time luftwaffe's website says "future gbu-48" for their Eurofighters... has nothing changed in that regards? Any other weapons integrated?
    Binkov's Battlegrounds - military analysis videos

    New video available! F-35 vs Su-35 (Part 2/2, the verdict)

  13. #1663
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Short answer no.

  14. #1664
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by totoro View Post
    Have any of them (if so, how many?) finally been integrated with and cleared to use guided air to ground weapons? For some time luftwaffe's website says "future gbu-48" for their Eurofighters... has nothing changed in that regards? Any other weapons integrated?
    I wish Air Forces Monthly and Combat Aircraft were searchable. There was an article on German Eurofighters during the last year that said Germany will install the latest software versions for tranche 2 and 3 aircraft. Why not? This is, however, not the same as training to use these weapons. As long as Germany has a low defense budget and keeps the Tornado on the front line, I cannot see them spending much money on ground attack training for Typhoon pilots.

  15. #1665
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Quote Originally Posted by mil View Post
    I wish Air Forces Monthly and Combat Aircraft were searchable. There was an article on German Eurofighters during the last year that said Germany will install the latest software versions for tranche 2 and 3 aircraft. Why not? This is, however, not the same as training to use these weapons. As long as Germany has a low defense budget and keeps the Tornado on the front line, I cannot see them spending much money on ground attack training for Typhoon pilots.
    The GAF has a fix requirement for A/S capability for the TLG 31's NRF assignment from 1st January 2018 onwards. By then the unit must be operational in the A/S role which includes the German variant of the GBU-48 (different fuze opposed to the "standard" model). However integration is only planned for P1Eb FW which is still some months away from being cleared by GAF. Integration under a national clearance is underway. If everything goes well actual live trials can start in Q3.

  16. #1666
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,011
    Vienna (AFP) - Austria's defence ministry will sue European giant Airbus over alleged corruption and bribery linked to a controversial $2 billion sale of Eurofighter jets, an official said Thursday.

    The country's largest-ever defence deal has been plagued by scandals from the very start.

    "We will file a lawsuit against Airbus," defence ministry spokesman Michael Bauer told AFP.

    He said the findings of a government investigation into the 2003 deal worth around 2 billion euros ($2.1 billion) will be presented later on Thursday morning.
    Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/austria-s...071214555.html

  17. #1667
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,592
    Why does not SAAB sue BAE Systems, too. BAE was involved in marketing Gripen at the time but surprise, surprise Typhoon got the deal even though Gripen would have been a much better choice for Austria.
    Sum ergo cogito

  18. #1668
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Spitfire9 View Post
    Why does not SAAB sue BAE Systems, too. BAE was involved in marketing Gripen at the time but surprise, surprise Typhoon got the deal even though Gripen would have been a much better choice for Austria.
    Because BAE also bribed for a saab sales in Africa?

  19. #1669
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    939
    Quote Originally Posted by Aurel View Post
    I still fail to imagine a scenario where both Typhoon and a vlo theatre bomber
    If the VLO asset is a UCAV then politically and operationally it might very well be preferable to have an inhabited aircraft in the same area

    There is also the fact that by emitting the VLO asset becomes less VLO. LPI is not NPI.
    Rule zero: don't be on fire

  20. #1670
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    7,002
    Quote Originally Posted by Spitfire9 View Post
    Why does not SAAB sue BAE Systems, too. BAE was involved in marketing Gripen at the time but surprise, surprise Typhoon got the deal even though Gripen would have been a much better choice for Austria.
    perhaps BAE had more money to make by selling EF than gripen and therefore priced gripen so high as to
    send the austrians to EF
    the missile will require about five times the G capability of the target to complete a successful intercept.
    -Robert L Shaw

  21. #1671
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    104
    Quote Originally Posted by obligatory View Post
    perhaps BAE had more money to make by selling EF than gripen and therefore priced gripen so high as to
    send the austrians to EF

    I would argue that Saab was a bit overconfident in Austria. They should have offered a more competitive deal and promoted it better than they did.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES