Using the 2008/2009 Swiss Eval to evaluate the Gripen E (described in that document has "MS21") will also means that it lags behind Typhoon P1E across the board... Wich is a bit ludicrious.
Just to remind, P1E, the "2015 Eurofighter" in that report, was implemented in late 2013 and had a full AIM-120/IRIST/AIM-132 capability, an integrated Litening pod, the EPIV and... nothing else.
The entire report is here:
Last edited by Sintra; 12th April 2017 at 23:57.
Yes. Hold on to the Swiss evaluation if you like (as a way of measuring Typhoon's inferiority), but don't compare a 2009 vintage Typhoon with a Gripes NG which is yet to fly (and I'm sure it will be a lovely aircraft).
In what way is sensor fusion and EW a weakness of Typhoon? People say sensor fusion is a weakness for Rafale, but I understand that all of the upcoming upgrades will add even more to the Rafale, so why can't we apply that same use of context to Typhoon (which has been flying operationally with it's multiple sensors working together admirably)?
On lots of levels, the British have been so happy with Typhoon that the once mandatory upgrades that we all knew would be necessary (tvc, cft, engine improvements) have all gone the way of the Dodo.
If that was the question, the answer is no, the only "operational" fighter that i am aware that is described publicly has having such a capability is good old Dave (there are a few old slides from Boeing touting the APG-79 has having the potential to do such a role).
If the question is "does the Praetorian DASS uses active arrays in its ECM/EW suite" the answer is yes.
Last edited by Sintra; 13th April 2017 at 10:40.
Raytheon had it as an upgrade path but they have demonstrated to the USAF EA capability on the F-15 AESA a while ago.there are a few old slides from Boeing touting the APG-79 has having the potential to do such a role
Old radar types never die; they just phased array
- On the "operational" bit, i did include "comas"
- On the AN/APG-79, like BIO stated above it was part of the upgrade path, and years ago i´ve seen severall slides stating some sort of a "future capability", but AFAIK there´s no recent description/confirmation that a "EW module" went into active service
Without going into quantative or qualitative comparisons, the sensor fusion deficiencies reported from the Swiss evaluation were valid at that time. The primary reason being deficiencies of the sensors itself, the fusiin simply didn't work as well which was very much a software/firmware issue. Meanwhile the reliability and performance of radar, IRST and ESM has improved considerably and MD fine tuning further helps to improve the sensor fusion. There are still some caveats, but the improvements are noticable. Drop 3 for T1 and P1Eb for T2/3 have both introduced further improvements in the SF area. At P2E the SF is considerably improved and a next big leap is targeted for P4E. It is noteworthy that P3Eb is essentially a cut down version of P4E. Note everything will be available for P3Eb as is considered for P4E, however. How it will work out at the end of the day remains to be seen. The devil is in the details and there might well be a discrepancy between shiny public advertisers and reality. You'll most likely not get a complete picture anyway for any of these aircraft, at best snippets. So talking about superiority in this case is a far stretch for anyone without actual inside. It can be concluded that the Rafale had a noticable edge at that time over both Gripen and Typhoon, it may still have that edge, but this can't be reasonably concluded without any specific details which you won't gather from public sources, apart from a few snippets.
As I understand it the Kuwait Captor-E in 2018 will be a basic AESA with no EW. So far only the UK 'radar 2' version arriving in the early 2020s will feature EW. It is a combination of both Selex's AESA work and QinetiQ's Bright Adder EW AESA research. At the same time I believe there is a DASS P4E update that will merge the EW and radar functions.
Excellent news; so Typhoon will finally grow up.
It is a bit curious though that it seems Switzerland will invite Rafale and Gripen but not Typhoon for their next eval... how come?
This does not translate into "it seems Switzerland will invite Rafale and Gripen but not Typhoon for their next eval".
Last edited by Sintra; 13th April 2017 at 19:30.
http://aviationweek.com/farnborough-...pean-countriesGermany also plans to add air-to-ground*antisurface*ship attack and suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) capabilities to its*Eurofighter*Typhoons in the coming years.
Anybody who has further info on the German Typhoon SEAD plans?
Nowhere near long enough in range, that's a heli-ASuW missile design for patrol boats and fast attack craft. The original plan was an ARM version of Meteor called ARMINGER.
Marte ER was tipped for the anti-ship role but Storm Shadow MLU could also add a more advanced ASuW capability.
ARMIGER was not based on Meteor, but used a ramjet engine based on that of the Meteor, not more, not less. If the GAF employs Typhoon in the SEAD role the AGM-88E AARGM is the most likely candidate for a dedicated ARM.
Last edited by Ryan; 16th April 2017 at 17:55.
Where are the plans for any ALARM replacement for the RAF might I ask?
Because sometimes in life we need a bit of fun
Integrating it externally on the F-35B will probably be a lower risk and cost since the USN is already paying for the software portion. Although with Italy as an AARGM partner it would make sense to integrate it on the Phoon if another operator also decides to procure it.
Old radar types never die; they just phased array
[QUOTE=Fedaykin;2385569]None so far, I believe vague mention by the MOD of using other capabilities...Brimstone/Storm Shadow/Tomahawk/Spear
Is it perhaps because they see the role of FCAS (or its operational successor) as clearing the way for manned aircraft with things like Spear3? Anyway, like you say, there are no plans to fill the gap, and that makes me wonder what the broader thinking is rather than look for a weapon that will go after missile sites.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)