Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 95

Thread: CSeries launch customer

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77

    CSeries launch customer

    Form this article on Aviation Week:
    http://www.aviationweek.com/Article....-02-455602.xml
    Bombardier expects the first flight for its CS100 by the end of this year, and entry-into-service in December 2013. Fuller declines to name the launch operator, although it is listed as an undisclosed firm order and according to Fuller it is one of the oldest operators in the world.
    I am following up closely the CSeries story and this article enlights details of the launch customer (still undisclosed).
    Many people on the net (and also journalists) keep saying that without orders from well-estabilished airlines (famous ones) the CSeries orders will not come so quickly...
    Who might be this one then? Could it be one of the "big guys"?
    from the original BBD's PR we have:
    http://www.bombardier.com/en/aerospa...01260d80183825
    Bombardier Aerospace announced today [june 20, 2011] that a major network carrier will be the first operator to take delivery of the first CSeries aircraft.
    Comes to my mind that several "major network carriers" like the US ones would firm orders for some more a/c than the firmed 10+6...
    So... checking the oldest airlines still in operations here comes the list!
    • KLM (1919)
    • Qantas (1920)
    • Aeroflot (1923)
    • Czech Airlines (1923)
    • Finnair (1923)
    • Delta Air Lines (1924) - I'd exclude DAL since last year stated that decision on small NBs would come in 2012
    • Tajik Air (1924)
    • Jat Airways (1927)
    • LOT Polish Airlines (1929)
    • LAN Airlines (1929)
    • Iberia (1929)
    • Aeropostal (1929)

    Please share your opinions on this misterious airline!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Oeteldonk, the Netherlands
    Posts
    5,104
    KLM is not one of the oldest airlines, it is the oldest, so not them. But I´ll leave it as a maybe. There was talk about KL/AF looking at the C-series to replace the F70s.

    QANTAS has outsourced their small planes. They are unlikely to order the C-Series for themselves, but perhaps for a subsidiary. Network Aviation flies six F100s with another 6 on order. So probably not Network Aviation, otherwise the six F100s on order would have been cancelled. Perhaps Qantaslink to replace their 717s?

    Aeroflot is already going for SSJ.

    CSA is a good bet, to replace their 735s. They got 8 of them, so 10+6 would be a good replacement with minor growth. But I do not think they are really a mayor network carrier.

    Finnair, not likely with their young Embraer fleet.

    Delta Air Lines, too small an order for such a large airline.

    Tajik Air, in no way shape or form are they a mayor network carrier.

    JAT, only a marginal network carrier at best.

    LOT Polish, not likely due to the large fleet of Embraers. Also, hard to describe them as a mayor network player.

    LAN Airlines, certainly would not rule them out.

    Iberia, another good possiblity. Perhaps for their new Iberia Express venture?

    Aeropostal, not a mayor airline.
    Last edited by tenthije; 8th May 2012 at 12:35.
    Click here to view my photos at JetPhotos.net!
    Click here to visit my website!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    Almost forgot! this statement rules out Gulf Air from being the launch customer... It's long being rumored that the Gulf carrier could be the launch customer for the CS100, but when early this year they did not announce any order at the Bahrain Air Show some doubts raised....
    The fact that GFA was founded in 1950 does not place them among the oldest operators...

    Talking about KLM:
    Yep is the oldest! and if they're the "launchers" is wise just saying "among the oldest", without revealing the identity...
    With their subsidiary KLM Cityhopper, they currently operate 26 F70, 5 F100 (in phase out) and 21 E190 (+1 order yet to deliver, soon).
    Since they have 100 seaters E190 and not the 115 seater E195 (and phasing out the 105 seater F100) it could be very likely that they opted for the CS100...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,681
    Quote Originally Posted by tenthije View Post
    KLM is not one of the oldest airlines, it is the oldest, so not them. But I´ll leave it as a maybe.
    As Paolins alludes to, it would make sense to describe KLM as among the oldest - as to state the oldest would completely give the game away.


    My question is - why would an airline keep an order quiet?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Paolins92 View Post
    Almost forgot! this statement rules out Gulf Air from being the launch customer... It's long being rumored that the Gulf carrier could be the launch customer for the CS100, but when early this year they did not announce any order at the Bahrain Air Show some doubts raised....
    The fact that GFA was founded in 1950 does not place them among the oldest operators...

    Talking about KLM:
    Yep is the oldest! and if they're the "launchers" is wise just saying "among the oldest", without revealing the identity...
    With their subsidiary KLM Cityhopper, they currently operate 26 F70, 5 F100 (in phase out) and 21 E190 (+1 order yet to deliver, soon).
    Since they have 100 seaters E190 and not the 115 seater E195 (and phasing out the 105 seater F100) it could be very likely that they opted for the CS100...
    hmm you never know.. maybe the recent incident with the SSJ (RIP to those onboard) may scare away customers who now have cold feet.
    CSeries main rival is the Mitsubishi MRJ.. same engine but all those delays will benefit the CSeries who can beat MRJ to the punch.

    but the problem is.. the E series is so well established. what do the SSJ, MRJ, and CSeries have over the latest E series?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by Amiga500 View Post
    As Paolins alludes to, it would make sense to describe KLM as among the oldest - as to state the oldest would completely give the game away.

    My question is - why would an airline keep an order quiet?
    Well... this is not clear to me... I guess that there may be so many reasons but I can't figure any of them...

    Quote Originally Posted by J-20 Hotdog View Post
    hmm you never know.. maybe the recent incident with the SSJ (RIP to those onboard) may scare away customers who now have cold feet.
    CSeries main rival is the Mitsubishi MRJ.. same engine but all those delays will benefit the CSeries who can beat MRJ to the punch.

    but the problem is.. the E series is so well established. what do the SSJ, MRJ, and CSeries have over the latest E series?
    I think that the SSJ accident (RIP to all on board) cannot mine the CSeries sales at all, otherwise.... airlines which were still deciding may opt for other aircraft other than the SSJ but this is all to see from what happened to the SSJ....
    An example may be Helvetic Airways (switzerland) which has a fleet of 6 F100 and stated in late 2011 that in 1 year and a half to 2 years (guess what, when the CS will "prove itself" with the 1st flight and the EIS) they would decide on a replacement aircraft and their CEO already said they've examined closely the CS100 and the SSJ100 at the Paris Airshow in 2011....
    So in this case they may opt for the CS...

    Anyway the CSeries advantage over the Embraer's E-Jets is still there due to the famous "all-new design" BBD's promoting since the project started... Furthermore the CS has a really wide fuselage over the E195 and the seating range for the CSeries family intercepts the E-Jets only on the lower end (100 to 150 vs 70 to 125 - talking about the whole family).
    Sure the re-engining of the E-jet will provide further advantages... we'll see... It is still a paper-project...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    Bahrain Air: another example of airline currently watching both CSeries and SSJ100:
    http://www.arabianaerospace.aero/d-d...aign=news_feed
    [...] By around that time [June 2012] it should be close to deciding which modern twinjet – CSeries or Superjet – will be the chosen contender to take it into the future. [...]
    Last edited by Paolins92; 11th May 2012 at 19:32. Reason: named airline

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,082
    Biggest E-jet - E195AR
    maximum no-frills seating 122
    range 2200 nm
    Smallest CSeries - CS100
    maximum no-frills seating 125
    range 2200 nm

    Differences?
    CS100 is more plane than E195AR: MTOW CS100 54,9 t, E195AR 52,3 t.

    What is the difference in empty weights, and how does fuel burn differ?

    CS100 also takes off, at ISA sea level, in 1500 m - E195AR needs 2200 m.

    E-jets go smaller than this (E195 down to 1400 nm of STD, E170 down to 80 seats at no frills and 36 t MTOW STD) CSeries bigger than this (CS100ER and CS300ER up to 2950 nm, CS300ER up to 145 seats no frills and 63,1 t MTOW).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    Chornedsnorkack basically made the point.... While the CS100 makes 2200 nm of range in the standard version (up to 2950 for the ER) the E195 requires it to be the AR version (Advanced Range) to range 2200 nm...

    For fuel burn they currently advertise IIRC around 16% less than the E195, as they show on the "animated" mockup at airshows.
    For other data, they are still unknown (like the Basic Empty Weight).

    Re-reading the statements and the above mentioned list.... I actually think that we'll see the KLM livery on the CS100....
    Each evening, stars come out their daylight hiding places... But one of those, is my wingtip, passing over...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    flying high
    Posts
    4,581
    Swiss maybe? - ok they are not undisclosed.
    Member of ACIG

    an unnamed Luftwaffe officer:"Typhoon is a warm weather plane. If you want to be operational at -20°C you have to deploy the F-4F."

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    Swiss is one of the first operators "launcher of the CS program" via Lufty but the first aircraft (at EIS - end of 2013) will be of this, yet undisclosed, operator.
    Last edited by Deano; 25th May 2012 at 19:41. Reason: CoC Rule 14
    Each evening, stars come out their daylight hiding places... But one of those, is my wingtip, passing over...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,082

    A318OEO

    How does CSeries compare against A318OEO - considering no A318NEO is offered (and no 737-600MAX either)?

    Seat count - no frills maximum:
    CS100 125
    A318 132
    Seat count - manufacturer "typical":
    CS100 110
    A318 107
    MTOW, highest
    CS100ER 58,1
    A318 68
    Range at maximum TOW and "typical" payload
    CS100ER 2950 nm
    A318 3200 nm
    But at lower TOW-s:
    CS100 non-ER at 54,9 t 2200 nm
    A318 weight variant at 63 t 2200 nm
    Takeoff distance at ISA sea level:
    CS100ER in 1500 m, and range 2950 nm
    A318 in 1800 m
    but A318 at 63 t in 1500 m.

    How far would Better on a Camel CS100ER fly out of London City?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    Based on statements, the CS100 has a 22,5 lower fuel consumption over the A318 and has a significantly lower CASM (.755 for the A318 and .638 for the CS100)

    Furthermore the A318 is restricted to operate from LCY with lower MTOW, indeed BA operates the A318 in all-busines 32-seat configuration on the LCY-JFK route.
    Each evening, stars come out their daylight hiding places... But one of those, is my wingtip, passing over...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Paolins92 View Post
    Furthermore the A318 is restricted to operate from LCY with lower MTOW, indeed BA operates the A318 in all-busines 32-seat configuration on the LCY-JFK route.
    No, they don´t and cannot. A318 only gets as far as Shannon, even with the 32 seats.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    Yeah, I meant the only A318-operated flight form LCY is BA's LCY-SNN-JFK.
    That's another "bonus" for the CSeries, which (analyzed by Flightglobal) would make it straight to JFK without the stop at SNN...
    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/fl...ries-go-h.html
    In all-business the CS100 will hold 44 pax against the 32 of the A318, considering that it is longer...
    Last edited by Deano; 25th May 2012 at 19:42. Reason: CoC Rule 14
    Each evening, stars come out their daylight hiding places... But one of those, is my wingtip, passing over...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Oeteldonk, the Netherlands
    Posts
    5,104
    Quote Originally Posted by chornedsnorkack View Post
    How does CSeries compare against A318OEO - considering no A318NEO is offered (and no 737-600MAX either)?
    I am not sure I quite understand what you're asking? YOu want us to compare the C series against a plane that Airbus has not even proposed (neither Boeing for the 600MAX)? Both the A318s and the B736s are lemmons. Neither Airbus nor Boeing will go through the trouble of redesigning them. There´s a reason why already several A318s have gone to the scrapper!



    Quote Originally Posted by Paolins92 View Post
    That's another "bonus" for the CSeries, which (analyzed by Flightglobal) would make it straight to JFK without the stop at SNN...
    I thought that one of the reasons for the stop at Shannon, apart from the obvious lack of range for the A318, is that City does not have sufficient customs and security available for flights to the USA? The Shannon stop is in part for pre-clearance to the USA. Is it possible / economically feasable to make City capable of handling scheduled US flights?
    Click here to view my photos at JetPhotos.net!
    Click here to visit my website!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,082
    Quote Originally Posted by tenthije View Post
    I am not sure I quite understand what you're asking? YOu want us to compare the C series against a plane that Airbus has not even proposed (neither Boeing for the 600MAX)? Both the A318s and the B736s are lemmons. Neither Airbus nor Boeing will go through the trouble of redesigning them. There´s a reason why already several A318s have gone to the scrapper!
    No. Against the OEO, which in contrast to NEO, exists and flies.

    And Airbus will at least put sharklets on A318 - but not new engines.

    How much range boost (or runway cut at constant range) shall A318OEO get from the sharklets? Because CSeries shall be competing against the sharkletted A318OEO, not the existing one.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Oeteldonk, the Netherlands
    Posts
    5,104
    What's the OEO? Is it just the identified for sharklets? If so, then I am willing to bet the point is still moot. If Airbus develops it, and that is a big if, then no airline or leasing company will order the A318OEO. It's too big for the job. Apparantly the A319 has practically the same running costs but has several more seats to raise the revenue. And if the A319 is too big, cheaper Embraers can be found. Much cheaper Fokkers if you don't mind going 2nd hand.
    Click here to view my photos at JetPhotos.net!
    Click here to visit my website!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,082
    It seems that A318OEO - defined as any A318 which is not the nonexistent NEO - has a total of 4 orders.
    In January-April 2012, net orders +1. 1 cancellation, 2 gross orders - both from private customers.

    E195 simply will not approach the performance of A318, with its mere 2200 nm range and needing 2200 m runway for that. As well as being 95 cm narrower than A318, while CSeries is mere 41 cm narrower.

    How does the takeoff distance of an abused/lightly loaded A319 compare against 318? I have not heard of 319 having steep approach capability.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Oeteldonk, the Netherlands
    Posts
    5,104
    Quote Originally Posted by chornedsnorkack View Post
    It seems that A318OEO - defined as any A318 which is not the nonexistent NEO - has a total of 4 orders.
    Still not following you. So you say the A318OEO is the original A318? The A318"classic" if you will? If that is the case, it's not competitive at all. As I already mentioned, several have already been scapped since it is more valuable as a spare parts source for A319s and A320s.
    Click here to view my photos at JetPhotos.net!
    Click here to visit my website!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,681
    Quote Originally Posted by chornedsnorkack View Post
    And Airbus will at least put sharklets on A318 - but not new engines.
    They have announced it (with the numbers you are looking for):

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...m-2013-347719/


    However, I have the feeling that engineering resource will be diverted to more urgent programs and A318 might be left to rot.
    Last edited by Amiga500; 14th May 2012 at 18:23.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    Qatar Airways, after looking at the CSeries since BBD launched it with LH, stated that discussions for an order will re-start in about 6 months/one year.
    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...months-371835/
    "It is going to be a very fine airplane," he [Al Baker] insists, adding that not only is Qatar Airways interested in operating the aircraft in its own fleet, but "we are interested in buying them for our leasing company" as well.
    In april this year, Al Baker stated that the numbers he's looking at are about 20 to 30 CS300 to operate short haul flights from Doha.
    http://www.canadianbusiness.com/arti...-business-jets
    Nonetheless he remains interested in eventually ordering 20 to 30 of the larger version of the 110- to 149-seat commercial plane, plus adding as many options. The aircraft would be used for Qatar's regional service and flights of less than 2 1/2 hours from Doha.
    Each evening, stars come out their daylight hiding places... But one of those, is my wingtip, passing over...

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,082

    Hydraulic ready for tests

    Hydraulic systems of Aircraft 0 test rig are ready for tests:
    http://www.bombardier.com/wps/portal...01260d8020c129

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    7
    The confirmation of the availability of sharklets for the A318 positions the aircraft against Bombardier's 110-seat CS100 aircraft
    So it would seem that it is a very reasonable comparison after all?

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    As per this AirInsight article (referring to official Airbus PR)
    http://airinsight.com/2011/12/02/the-winglet-war/
    The "sharklets" improvement in fuel burn is 2.4%. Let's say it is 3%... The CSeries still has a 19% improvement in fuel consumption...
    So I'd say, referring to Leahy's statement: "There is virtually no business case left for the A318."
    Each evening, stars come out their daylight hiding places... But one of those, is my wingtip, passing over...

  26. #26
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    7
    Let's hope that some more customers start ordering it, then.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Turin, Italy
    Posts
    77
    EgyptAir joins the "interested Airlines" list.
    http://atwonline.com/aircraft-engine...-aircraft-0604

    Other airlines that stated they are studying the CSeries among other aircraft to integrate in their fleet are: easyJet and SilkAir, plus Qatar Airways as already posted above.
    Each evening, stars come out their daylight hiding places... But one of those, is my wingtip, passing over...

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,681
    It has finally come to pass... Bombardier openly admit they are gunning for A319.

    CS300 to seat 160 seats in high-density config.

    Look @ aviationweek.com for the release.


    Be interesting to see if this gets them more market traction.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    London, United Kingdom
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by Amiga500 View Post
    It has finally come to pass... Bombardier openly admit they are gunning for A319.

    CS300 to seat 160 seats in high-density config.
    As Airbus have found out, the 160 seat airline market is dead! Just look at the A319 sales figures.

    Airbus have 181 A319s left on order... I say 'left on order' because over the past 1.5 years, Airbus have sold only 18. Yes EIGHTEEN A319s. (11 of these orders came from one airline, American Airlines).

    Considering how many thousands of NEOs Airbus are constantly telling us they've sold, the A319 makes up a very small percentage of sales.

    Even easyJet, a long standing A319 customer, swapped all its A319s on order for A320s.

    Now granted, the A319 order slow-down might be down to operators realising that the operating costs of the A319 are very similar to that of the A320, so you might as well get the larger A320 - but if there was really such a demand for 160 seat aircraft I'm sure the airlines would have raised the issue with the manufacturers by now.

    Edit; When you type into google "Airbus A319 Order" and the top news story that keeps turning up is that of Drukair's order for 1 A319 from the Farnborough Air Show, you know orders are slow *giggle*
    Last edited by Matt-100; 31st August 2012 at 21:58.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,082

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES