Key.Aero Network
Register Free

Page 11 of 33 FirstFirst ... 78910111213141521 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 330 of 965

Thread: Pak-Fa news thread part 20

  1. #301
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    712
    So is F-15's. That said, PAK FA's landing gear seemed over sized for me from the start. It doesn't take away the looks or anything, but it looks much stronger than Su-27's for example, which is heavier. So i suspect LG and wheelbays will shrink and get weight cut. Of course it might be designed with carrier version in mind, but isn't that jumping ahead of yourself?

  2. #302
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    77
    @ Berkut

    PAK FA's landing gear was designed to operate from short, unprepared runways

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    .de
    Posts
    1,706
    Quote Originally Posted by Acatomic View Post
    @ Berkut

    PAK FA's landing gear was designed to operate from short, unprepared runways
    It was? just like the F-35C then (almost).
    Patrick

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by Levsha View Post
    It was? just like the F-35C then (almost).
    OK, let me correct myself


    PAK FA's landing gear is designed to operate from short, unprepared runways.

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,597
    So...what are we looking at here? Is this 51, or maybe they modified T-50-0 (KPO) with the IRST mock-up and a canopy?

    ( T-50 knowledgeable folks know that the initial images of T-50-0 shows it without an IRST mock-up, and without a canopy )

    Via Comet @aviaforum

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    760
    T-50-0. Now that's what I call testing to destruction (they even smashed the canopy!)

    Interesting test equipment relacing the tail-fins.

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,597
    Nah , don't think the canopy is smashed , they probably cut that piece for easier access to the inside (as oposed to sliding the thing somehow whenever they need to)

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Jō Asakura View Post
    Hey guys! I think I may have had an (open source) 'eureka moment' regarding PAK-FA and S-ducts, it's a little long-winded so bear with me…

    Here is an extract from a technical paper from Ufa State Aviation University (Уфа: УГАТУ) regarding the development of the next generation engine (by referring to the "fifth generation engine"- it is, by all accounts, referring to the PAK-FA stage 2 engine in all but name), dated 2008:



    So what they're talking about is developing a fan-blade composed of what they call 'Meta-Composites', in this case a magnesium matrix reinforced with boron-carbon fibre composite. This would replace the Titanium superalloy 1st stage of the compressor.

    Here comes the 'Da Vinci Code' bit, assessing the EM properties of the above composition...and guess what?...

    Here is a Chinese technical paper on magnesium (Mg) alloys which it describes as possessing "special radar-absorption characteristics, low density and high rigidity…".

    http://www.ysxbcn.com/upfile/soft/200961/2004-02-22.pdf

    I don't know about 'Have Glass', but magnesium is used in Eurofighter's canopy seal. As for Boron, isotopes of Boron are designed to absorb radar waves and Boron Carbide is a RAM.

    The best bit, according to a more recent technical paper from Ufa State Aviation University (Уфа: УГАТУ) dated 28/04/12:



    So it appears to be a very high-tech and elegant solution, also involved in composite fan blade development are FGUP TsIAM and FGUP VIAM (ФГУП ЦИАМ & ФГУП ВИАМ), these are big on nanotech, so I guess the final composition will be very interesting indeed!

    Note 'NPP Motor' also worked on NPO Saturn's 117S and 117. Kinda makes you wonder about the FM2's front cover huh Berkut?

    Pretty informative stuff. thanks.

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    3,558
    So now the Russians are stealing tech from the Chinese ?
    Love Planes, Live Planes

  10. #310
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by Jō Asakura View Post
    Note 'NPP Motor' also worked on NPO Saturn's 117S and 117. Kinda makes you wonder about the FM2's front cover huh Berkut?
    Hmmm, not following your logic here to be honest. FM2 is being developed by Salut not by Saturn. So if anything 117 engine should make me wonder.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jō Asakura View Post
    AND NO BLOCKER.
    It is interesting hypothesis, that blades will be able to "eat" all radar waves making blocker not needed, but i am not convinced just yet. The fact they are stealthifying the blades doesn't mean that is the only thing they will use.

    Blades on NK-32 was treated as well, but that isn't the only thing they did in Tu-160 intakes.

    PS: Considering our dear Petr Butovsky has been kind enough to show us "Izd 30" fan-blades, i still don't think there is anything mysterious about FM2 ones. But good research. Magnesium rings a bell somewhere, i fancy it was used on B-2?
    Last edited by Berkut; 13th July 2012 at 12:05.

  11. #311
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,184
    Quote Originally Posted by Jō Asakura View Post
    Being the nice guy I am, I'll go out of my way to pander to your disposition:

    IT MEANS NO S-DUCT……...AND NO BLOCKER.
    I am not convinced either, that fan will still bounce off a ripple, no matter how tiny and a decent passive suite on enemy aircraft will be able to identify Pak-fa's presence.

  12. #312
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,354
    Quote Originally Posted by Twinblade View Post
    I am not convinced either, that fan will still bounce off a ripple, no matter how tiny and a decent passive suite on enemy aircraft will be able to identify Pak-fa's presence.
    Lets be realistic shall we.
    Nobody claims these treated fan blades will not bounce back zippo radar waves..
    The point is how much reduction, right!
    For Sukhoi to keep the Flanker like Airduct/intakes, this will ensure the insane freedom of slow/poststall speed regime performance and no reduction in airflow(blockers!).
    Also, there is the partly twisted airduct, every bit counts for the total result.

    All in all, as a compromise, it is brilliant solution.
    The spirit of Simonov seems to live on
    Last edited by haavarla; 13th July 2012 at 17:47.
    Thanks

  13. #313
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    3,354
    Following the recent good posts here:


    On the modernization of production and infrastructure of the plant Komsomol "Dry" in 2012 planned to spend 1.4 billion rubles

    Moscow, July 13. About 650 million rubles will be allocated to the technical development of part of the holding "Sukhoi" Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Association. Yuri Gagarin (KNAAPO). These funds will be used for technical renovation and modernization of the plant, the implementation of energy efficiency programs, etc. In the third and fourth quarter of 2012 the company will be established fifteen units of high-tech machining, cutting and bending equipment and warehouse complex. Until the end of the year in various departments of the plant will install the latest from the 22 leading domestic and foreign manufacturers. Here and in the new airfield equipment for flight test station, and lifting and networking equipment, computers, devices in the Office of the Chief Metrologist and the Central Laboratory, and special equipment for a number of shops. In addition, at the expense of the federal target program "Development of the military-industrial complex of the Russian Federation for the period 2011-2020, the" beginning of the year in the shops KnAAPO has 12 machines. In the near future will be running another 4 units of metallurgical equipment, and before the end of the year - two machining centers and a range of cutting.

    Some equipment, installed at the plant, has no analogues in Russia. For example, machining centers for machining of titanium alloys in the world there are only a few copies. To enter and use such equipment in the pool is being renovated shops, transformer substation, as well as staff training. A total of 2012 for capital investments (infrastructure, modernization of production and the association) is planned 1.412 billion rubles.

    Modernization and upgrading of production KnAAPO implemented according to plan the technical development of the enterprise. Putting high-tech equipment to improve performance, reduce production cycle, to improve the quality of parts and, more importantly, to improve working conditions at the plant.

    http://www.sukhoi.org/news/company/?id=4913
    Thanks

  14. #314
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    712
    I don't see it being confusing. Seems they are just doubling RCS measures. So if somehow radarwaves get though the blocker they will be "eaten" again by the blades.

    Or they just do it fo sh!t and giggles. Like they apparently did Su-47 for that exact reason according to some here.

  15. #315
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    647
    T-50 top fuselage composite panel quality check at ONPO "Tekhnologiya"
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	T-50-composite-fuselage.jpg 
Views:	1290 
Size:	189.5 KB 
ID:	206791   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	T-50-composite-fuselage_1.jpg 
Views:	1115 
Size:	254.2 KB 
ID:	206792  
    Last edited by flateric; 14th July 2012 at 22:28.

  16. #316
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    712
    While we are at it... Another picture of previously shown panel if anyone recalls.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Panell 3.jpg 
Views:	1608 
Size:	164.1 KB 
ID:	206793   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Panell 3 screen.jpg 
Views:	1122 
Size:	53.5 KB 
ID:	206794  

  17. #317
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,281
    Yes, that one was even exhibited at MAKS 2011 IIRC, and the wing panel has been shown as well.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	131411940555005060.jpg 
Views:	1229 
Size:	48.1 KB 
ID:	206795   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image_big.jpeg 
Views:	1832 
Size:	130.1 KB 
ID:	206796   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	panels.png 
Views:	1185 
Size:	297.6 KB 
ID:	206797  

  18. #318
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    248
    They seem to be using generous amounts of tape. What is it for?
    Mostly female workforce...

  19. #319
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,149
    Quote Originally Posted by mack8 View Post
    Via Comet @aviaforum
    WOW!


    What a whiffletree!


    I need to send this to some stresser head mates!!

  20. #320
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,281

  21. #321
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by flateric View Post
    T-50 top fuselage composite panel quality check at ONPO "Tekhnologiya"
    The panel from the photo seems to be 1 cm thick.
    I recall DjCross when T-50 flew first saying that from panels thickness one could approximately give what kind of band radars the platform will be invisible.Can somebody confirm this and what would be the target?
    Sorry if the assumption sounds silly

  22. #322
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by edi_right_round View Post
    The panel from the photo seems to be 1 cm thick.
    I recall DjCross when T-50 flew first saying that from panels thickness one could approximately give what kind of band radars the platform will be invisible.Can somebody confirm this and what would be the target?
    Sorry if the assumption sounds silly
    No, it isn't silly. I would say it is less than 1 cm if one looks at the hexagon and compare with for example ring on her hand.

  23. #323
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    647
    it's thinner at hexagon opening area as there's no honeycomb insert there
    I'd say it's about an inch thick where honeycomb are
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  24. #324
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    567
    Quote Originally Posted by edi_right_round View Post
    The panel from the photo seems to be 1 cm thick.
    I recall DjCross when T-50 flew first saying that from panels thickness one could approximately give what kind of band radars the platform will be invisible.Can somebody confirm this and what would be the target?
    Sorry if the assumption sounds silly
    This is true, but only to a certain extent. Convenctional RAM requires a certain thickness to be effective (I think on the order the wavelength/2 or the wavelength/4 IIRC). This is also true of conventional Jaumann absorbers. However, comparatively new (that is to the conventional Jaumann absorber) capacitive Jaumann absorbers do not require this. This is what the F-35 is rumored to use, and it would make sense for the T-50 to use the same.

  25. #325
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    647
    Quote Originally Posted by WinterStars View Post
    Mostly female workforce...
    because they are the most accurate ... at certain areas

  26. #326
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    445
    Quote Originally Posted by WinterStars View Post
    They seem to be using generous amounts of tape. What is it for?
    Mostly female workforce...
    Russians like sexy

  27. #327
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Malmesbury UK
    Posts
    3,102
    Quote Originally Posted by flateric View Post
    because they are the most accurate ... at certain areas
    They learned their trade re-covering the wings of An-2's with fabric & dope .........



    Ken
    Flanker Freak & Russian Aviation Enthusiast.
    Flankers (& others) website at :-
    http://flankers.co.uk/

  28. #328
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    760
    A report from an engine technology exhibition some time late 2011 detailing FGUP TsIAM's work.

    http://engine.aviaport.ru/issues/79/pics/pg04.pdf

    As regards PAK-FA, TsIAM is delegated work regarding:

    малоступенчатым высоконагруженным вентилятору и КВД с низкой массой;
    A fewer staged, high loading fan and a low mass, HP compressor;

    основной высокотемпературной камере сгорания;
    The main high-temperature combustion chamber;

    высокотемпературной одноступенчатой ТВД;
    High-temperature, single-staged HP turbine;

    легкой форсажной бесстабилизаторной камере сгорания;
    A lean-burn combustion chamber without a stabilizer

    цифровой САУ с полной ответственностью (FADEC).
    FADEC

    Also reported is work on a UAV (UCAV?) engine and conceptual design of the PAK-DA engine.

    Interesting pics:
    БЛИСК турбины из биметаллического сплава (page 5, top left)
    BLISK turbines made of a bi-metallic alloy

    Камера сгорания перспективного ТРДД (page 5, middle-left)
    Section of combustion chamber for a future engine

    Лопатка РК модернизированного КНД из полимерного композита (page 6, top left)
    Fan blade 'RK' for upgraded LP compressor made of polymer composites.

    Лопатки РК и НА перспективного КНД (page 7, top left)
    Fan blades 'RK' & 'NA' for a future LP compressor

    Рабочие лопатки турбины из композиционных материалов (page 7, bottom-left)
    Working fan-blades of a turbine made of composite materials.

  29. #329
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,281
    'RK' = rotor, 'NA' = stator.

  30. #330
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    647

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

- Part of the    Network -

KEY AERO AVIATION NEWS

MAGAZINES

AVIATION FORUM

SHOP

 

WEBSITES