@ Berkut
PAK FA's landing gear was designed to operate from short, unprepared runways![]()
|
|
|
So is F-15's. That said, PAK FA's landing gear seemed over sized for me from the start. It doesn't take away the looks or anything, but it looks much stronger than Su-27's for example, which is heavier. So i suspect LG and wheelbays will shrink and get weight cut. Of course it might be designed with carrier version in mind, but isn't that jumping ahead of yourself?
@ Berkut
PAK FA's landing gear was designed to operate from short, unprepared runways![]()
So...what are we looking at here? Is this 51, or maybe they modified T-50-0 (KPO) with the IRST mock-up and a canopy?
( T-50 knowledgeable folks know that the initial images of T-50-0 shows it without an IRST mock-up, and without a canopy )
Via Comet @aviaforum
![]()
T-50-0. Now that's what I call testing to destruction (they even smashed the canopy!)
Interesting test equipment relacing the tail-fins.![]()
Nah , don't think the canopy is smashed , they probably cut that piece for easier access to the inside (as oposed to sliding the thing somehow whenever they need to)
So now the Russians are stealing tech from the Chinese ?
Love Planes, Live Planes
Hmmm, not following your logic here to be honest. FM2 is being developed by Salut not by Saturn. So if anything 117 engine should make me wonder.
It is interesting hypothesis, that blades will be able to "eat" all radar waves making blocker not needed, but i am not convinced just yet. The fact they are stealthifying the blades doesn't mean that is the only thing they will use.
Blades on NK-32 was treated as well, but that isn't the only thing they did in Tu-160 intakes.
PS: Considering our dear Petr Butovsky has been kind enough to show us "Izd 30" fan-blades, i still don't think there is anything mysterious about FM2 ones. But good research. Magnesium rings a bell somewhere, i fancy it was used on B-2?
Last edited by Berkut; 13th July 2012 at 12:05.
Lets be realistic shall we.
Nobody claims these treated fan blades will not bounce back zippo radar waves..
The point is how much reduction, right!
For Sukhoi to keep the Flanker like Airduct/intakes, this will ensure the insane freedom of slow/poststall speed regime performance and no reduction in airflow(blockers!).
Also, there is the partly twisted airduct, every bit counts for the total result.
All in all, as a compromise, it is brilliant solution.
The spirit of Simonov seems to live on![]()
Last edited by haavarla; 13th July 2012 at 17:47.
Thanks
Following the recent good posts here:
On the modernization of production and infrastructure of the plant Komsomol "Dry" in 2012 planned to spend 1.4 billion rubles
Moscow, July 13. About 650 million rubles will be allocated to the technical development of part of the holding "Sukhoi" Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Association. Yuri Gagarin (KNAAPO). These funds will be used for technical renovation and modernization of the plant, the implementation of energy efficiency programs, etc. In the third and fourth quarter of 2012 the company will be established fifteen units of high-tech machining, cutting and bending equipment and warehouse complex. Until the end of the year in various departments of the plant will install the latest from the 22 leading domestic and foreign manufacturers. Here and in the new airfield equipment for flight test station, and lifting and networking equipment, computers, devices in the Office of the Chief Metrologist and the Central Laboratory, and special equipment for a number of shops. In addition, at the expense of the federal target program "Development of the military-industrial complex of the Russian Federation for the period 2011-2020, the" beginning of the year in the shops KnAAPO has 12 machines. In the near future will be running another 4 units of metallurgical equipment, and before the end of the year - two machining centers and a range of cutting.
Some equipment, installed at the plant, has no analogues in Russia. For example, machining centers for machining of titanium alloys in the world there are only a few copies. To enter and use such equipment in the pool is being renovated shops, transformer substation, as well as staff training. A total of 2012 for capital investments (infrastructure, modernization of production and the association) is planned 1.412 billion rubles.
Modernization and upgrading of production KnAAPO implemented according to plan the technical development of the enterprise. Putting high-tech equipment to improve performance, reduce production cycle, to improve the quality of parts and, more importantly, to improve working conditions at the plant.
http://www.sukhoi.org/news/company/?id=4913
Thanks
I don't see it being confusing. Seems they are just doubling RCS measures. So if somehow radarwaves get though the blocker they will be "eaten" again by the blades.
Or they just do it fo sh!t and giggles.Like they apparently did Su-47 for that exact reason according to some here.
T-50 top fuselage composite panel quality check at ONPO "Tekhnologiya"
Last edited by flateric; 14th July 2012 at 22:28.
While we are at it... Another picture of previously shown panel if anyone recalls.
Yes, that one was even exhibited at MAKS 2011 IIRC, and the wing panel has been shown as well.
They seem to be using generous amounts of tape. What is it for?
Mostly female workforce...
Last edited by Trident; 15th July 2012 at 13:41.
The panel from the photo seems to be 1 cm thick.
I recall DjCross when T-50 flew first saying that from panels thickness one could approximately give what kind of band radars the platform will be invisible.Can somebody confirm this and what would be the target?
Sorry if the assumption sounds silly
it's thinner at hexagon opening area as there's no honeycomb insert there
I'd say it's about an inch thick where honeycomb are
This is true, but only to a certain extent. Convenctional RAM requires a certain thickness to be effective (I think on the order the wavelength/2 or the wavelength/4 IIRC). This is also true of conventional Jaumann absorbers. However, comparatively new (that is to the conventional Jaumann absorber) capacitive Jaumann absorbers do not require this. This is what the F-35 is rumored to use, and it would make sense for the T-50 to use the same.
A report from an engine technology exhibition some time late 2011 detailing FGUP TsIAM's work.
http://engine.aviaport.ru/issues/79/pics/pg04.pdf
As regards PAK-FA, TsIAM is delegated work regarding:
малоступенчатым высоконагруженным вентилятору и КВД с низкой массой;
A fewer staged, high loading fan and a low mass, HP compressor;
основной высокотемпературной камере сгорания;
The main high-temperature combustion chamber;
высокотемпературной одноступенчатой ТВД;
High-temperature, single-staged HP turbine;
легкой форсажной бесстабилизаторной камере сгорания;
A lean-burn combustion chamber without a stabilizer
цифровой САУ с полной ответственностью (FADEC).
FADEC
Also reported is work on a UAV (UCAV?) engine and conceptual design of the PAK-DA engine.
Interesting pics:
БЛИСК турбины из биметаллического сплава (page 5, top left)
BLISK turbines made of a bi-metallic alloy
Камера сгорания перспективного ТРДД (page 5, middle-left)
Section of combustion chamber for a future engine
Лопатка РК модернизированного КНД из полимерного композита (page 6, top left)
Fan blade 'RK' for upgraded LP compressor made of polymer composites.
Лопатки РК и НА перспективного КНД (page 7, top left)
Fan blades 'RK' & 'NA' for a future LP compressor
Рабочие лопатки турбины из композиционных материалов (page 7, bottom-left)
Working fan-blades of a turbine made of composite materials.
'RK' = rotor, 'NA' = stator.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)